Cash v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Carson James Cash
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2022cv03124
Filed: July 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Karen L McNaught
Referring Judge: Sue E Myerscough
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Catherine A Seagle on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Seagle, Catherine)
July 26, 2022 Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by Carson James Cash as to Commissioner of Social Security 7/26/2022. (GL)
July 12, 2022 Filing 5 PROPOSED ORDER: CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. (Sutterfield, David)
July 12, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. Commissioner of Social Security served on 7/12/2022, answer due 11/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(GL)
July 11, 2022 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER by US Magistrate Judge Karen McNaught: Plaintiff Carson Cash's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis #2 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section is ALLOWED. The plaintiff's application was submitted under penalty of perjury and sufficiently demonstrates the plaintiff should be excused from paying the filing fee. It is ordered that the Clerk issue summons and the United States Marshal serve a copy of the Complaint, summons and this Text Order upon the defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. Entered by Magistrate Judge Karen L. McNaught on 7/11/2022. (GL)
July 8, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by David Sutterfield on behalf of Carson James Cash (Sutterfield, David)
July 8, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Carson James Cash. Responses due by 7/22/2022 (Sutterfield, David)
July 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Carson James Cash. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Interest, #3 AC extension notice, #4 Summons for issuance, #5 USM-285 forms)(Sutterfield, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cash v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carson James Cash
Represented By: David Sutterfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: US ATTY-SPRINGFIELD SSA
Represented By: Catherine A Seagle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?