Roddis v. Kolitwenzew
| Ryan M. Roddis |
| Chad Kolitwenzew |
| Habeas Attorney General |
| 3:2022cv03159 |
| August 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.) by Respondent Chad Kolitwenzew. Responses due by 11/2/2022 (Schneider, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Joshua M Schneider on behalf of Chad Kolitwenzew (Schneider, Joshua) |
Filing 2
ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 8/29/22. Respondent has 60 days to file a response to the Petition pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. This court further orders that Respondent should attach those portions of the state court record which are relevant to Petitioner's claims and to the issues of the statute of limitations, exhaustion of state remedies, and procedural default. See written Order.(Responses due by 10/28/22.)(TC)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), filed by Ryan M. Roddis. Filing Fee of $ 5.00 paid, receipt # 300000134. (MAS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
