Trotter v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Michael Trotter
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2022cv03185
Filed: September 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Karen L McNaught
Referring Judge: Sue E Myerscough
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2022 Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Michael Trotter as to U.S. Attorney General 9/29/2022. (ANW)
September 22, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Emily S Cohn on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Cohn, Emily)
September 16, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/16/2022, answer due 1/17/2023. (Attachments: #1 summons, #2 summons)(ANW)
September 16, 2022 TEXT ORDER by US Magistrate Judge Karen McNaught: Plaintiff Kathleen Shuck's Petition to Proceed in forma pauperis #1 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section is ALLOWED. The plaintiff's application was submitted under penalty of perjury and sufficiently demonstrates the plaintiff should be excused from paying the filing fee. It is ordered that the Clerk issue summons and the United States Marshal serve a copy of the Complaint, summons and this Text Order upon the defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i). All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States. (ANW)
September 14, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Michael Trotter, filed by Michael Trotter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summonses)(Konoski, Bryan)
September 14, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael Trotter. Responses due by 9/28/2022 (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Konoski, Bryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trotter v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Trotter
Represented By: Bryan Matthew Konoski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: US ATTY-SPRINGFIELD SSA
Represented By: Emily S Cohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: CSS-Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?