Barlow-Johnson v. Springfield Memorial Hospital et al
| Kendra Barlow-Johnson |
| Springfield Memorial Hospital and Leanne Novar |
| 3:2022cv03186 |
| September 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Karen L McNaught |
| Sue E Myerscough |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Status Update #5 is ALLOWED. The Court has received and is considering Plaintiff's petition to proceed in forma pauperis #2 . The Clerk is DIRECTED to send to Plaintiff's corrected address a copy of this text order. Entered by Magistrate Judge Karen L. McNaught on 10/20/2022. (ME)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Status Update by Plaintiff Kendra Barlow-Johnson. Responses due by 11/2/2022 (ME) |
| Filing 4 CORRECTED NOTICE of Change of Address by Kendra Barlow-Johnson (ME) |
| Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable, re docket sheet. Envelope marked RTS, No Such Number, Unable to Forward. (GL) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Kendra Barlow-Johnson. Responses due by 9/29/2022 (ME) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kendra Barlow-Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed summonses)(ME) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
