Copher v. Rols Inc. d/b/a CBQ Services
Sherry Copher |
Rols Inc. d/b/a CBQ Services and Rols Inc doing business as CBQ Services |
3:2022cv03266 |
December 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Karen L McNaught |
Sue E Myerscough |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Paige Moray Neel on behalf of Rols Inc (Neel, Paige) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Sherry Copher. Rols Inc waiver sent on 12/8/2022, answer due 2/6/2023. (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Rols Inc. d/b/a CBQ Services. Original Summons returned to Attorney Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis to effectuate service. (GL) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by David Scott Klain on behalf of Sherry Copher (Klain, David) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Taxiarchis Hatzidimitriadis on behalf of Sherry Copher (Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rols Inc. d/b/a CBQ Services ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-4088530.), filed by Sherry Copher. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Credit Report, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Hatzidimitriadis, Taxiarchis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.