Alford v. Crawford
Defendant: Brandon Alford and . Crawford
Respondent: Ra'Shawn Walker
Case Number: 3:2023cv03013
Filed: January 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Joe Billy McDade
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2023 Filing 5 RESPONSE to Motion re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.) filed by Respondent Ra'Shawn Walker. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Kienstra, Jeffrey)
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER: Respondent's #4 Motion to Substitute Attorney is GRANTED. Attorney Jeffrey D. Kienstra is added for Respondent. Attorney W. Scott Simpson's representation of Respondent is terminated. The Clerk is also DIRECTED to substitute Ra'Shawn Walker for Crawford as the Respondent in this matter, and to identify Brandon Alford as Petitioner rather than Defendant. Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 03/06/2023. (KPR)
March 3, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION to Substitute Attorney, W. Scott Simpson to be replaced by Jeffrey D. Kienstra, by Defendant. Crawford. Responses due by 3/17/2023 (Kienstra, Jeffrey)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 2/28/2023. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. The Clerk SHALL serve a copy of the Petition (doc. #1 ) upon the Respondent. 2. Respondent SHALL file an answer, motion, or other responsive pleading to Petitioner's claim within fourteen (14) days of this Order. Respondent should address any facts that would establish whether Petitioner's claim is untimely or procedurally barred. In addition, Respondent should address the merits of Petitioner's claim and otherwise fully comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Proceedings for the United States District Courts. 3. Petitioner MAY file a reply to Respondent's response within fourteen (14) days of being served with the response. 4. Petitioner SHALL serve upon the United States Attorney's office a copy of every further pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. See full written Order.(JS)
February 10, 2023 Filing 2 Letter to the Court filed by Brandon Alford. (JS)
January 23, 2023 Magistrate Judge Karen L. McNaught no longer assigned to case. (JS)
January 20, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5 SPR300000343), filed by Brandon Alford.(JS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alford v. Crawford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brandon Alford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: . Crawford
Represented By: W. Scott Simpson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ra'Shawn Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?