Young v. Sheedy et al
| Terrez M Young |
| Erin Sheedy, Sean Yates, Jordan J Garrison, State of Illinois and Joshua A. Meyer |
| 3:2023cv03184 |
| May 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colleen R Lawless |
| Karen L McNaught |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RULE 12(C) NOTICE entered re #10 MOTION to Dismiss (JJK) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendants Jordan J Garrison, Joshua A. Meyer. Responses due by 8/3/2023 (Cook, Lisa) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 7/20/2023: On July 12, 2023, Plaintiff Terrez Young filed an Affidavit of Service for Summons #8 served on Judge Joshua Meyer, who was not listed as a defendant in the complaint filed in this case. The Clerk is directed to add Judge Joshua Meyer as a defendant in this case. Answer due date is August 10, 2023.(BL)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Joshua Meyer answer due 8/10/2023. (BL) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Lisa A Cook on behalf of Jordan J Garrison, Joshua A. Meyer (Cook, Lisa) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Jordan J Garrison answer due 8/3/2023. (BL) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED on June 29, 2023 as to Defendant Jordan Garrison. Answer due date August 3, 2023. (BL) Modified on 7/13/2023 to correct filing event. (BL) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Judge Joshua Meyer on June 29, 2023, filed by Terrez M Young. (BL) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Original Summons mailed to Plaintiff to effect service.) (DM) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 6/8/2023: Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining OrderPermanent Injunction and Demand for an Emergency Hearing #5 . Specifically, Plaintiff asks this court to restrain the defendants from any further state court action until the federal court dispute is adjudicated. The Younger abstention doctrine prohibits federal courts from intervening in ongoing state proceedings. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971). The Younger abstention doctrine applies when the federal plaintiffs requested relief would interfere with an ongoing state criminal proceeding. See Mass. Delivery Assn v. Coakley, 671 F.3d 33, 40 (1st Cir. 2012). Here, Plaintiff's claims would certainly disrupt the pending state case as he is requesting this Court stop the state proceedings relating to his traffic violation. Plaintiff has not demonstrated any extraordinary circumstances that would make abstention inappropriate. Therefore, based on the Younger abstention doctrine, Plaintiffs Motion is DENIED. (BL)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Permanent Injunction, MOTION Asking for Emergency Hearing by Plaintiff Terrez M Young. Responses due by 6/21/2023 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit) (TC) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Terrez M. Young. (BL) |
| Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 300000616. (BL) |
| TEXT ORDER entered by US Magistrate Judge Karen McNaught on 5/25/2023: Plaintiff has filed a complaint in this matter, but has not paid the filing fee. Within 21 days of this order, plaintiff is to pay the filing fee of $402 or file a properly supported motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk shall serve this order on plaintiff by U.S. mail.(BL) |
| Filing 3 +++ SEALED DOCUMENT.--Birth Certificate and Passport. (DM) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT by Terrez M Young. (DM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Terrez M Young. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
