Lee v. People of the State of Illinois et al
| Rivaughn Lee |
| People of the State of Illinois, Ruben Brandon, Shawn Turner, Esmond Jones, Xavier Edgecombe and Kenneth Powel |
| 3:2023cv03204 |
| June 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT entered. (ANW) |
Filing 6
MERIT REVIEW ORDER Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 6/21/23. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and any attempt to amend his Complaint would be futile. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); 28 U.S.C. 1915A. 2. In addition, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based upon Plaintiff's failure to exhaust properly his administrative remedies, as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, before he filed this suit.3. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in all Defendants favor and against Plaintiff. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER. (ANW)
|
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 6/12/2023. Plaintiff's motion to request counsel #5 is DENIED. The Court generally will not consider recruiting counsel for a pro se plaintiff until the Court determines that he possess a claim upon which relief can be granted after the Court conducts a review of the complaint. Plaintiff may renew his motion if his claim survives that review that the Court will conduct in the near future. (SAG)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Rivaughn Lee. Responses due by 6/23/2023 (SAG) |
| Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Rivaughn Lee (SAG) |
| Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Rivaughn Lee.(SAG) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Urbana Division, 201 S Vine Street, Urbana, IL 61802.Merit Review Deadline set for 6/29/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Rivaughn Lee.(SAG) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $38.72. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court within 30 days of this order. After payment of the initial partial filing fee (or immediately if no funds are available for that payment) the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source, including gifts. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff's account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff's place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office, and to Plaintiff. Prisoner Prepayment due by 7/10/2023. Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 6/9/2023. (SAG)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
