Carrell v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Catherine Carrell |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security - Office of the General Counsel |
| 3:2023cv03214 |
| June 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colleen R Lawless |
| Karen L McNaught |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable, re 6/26/2023 TEXT ORDER mailed to Plaintiff Catherine Carrell. (BL) |
| TEXT ORDER entered by US Magistrate Judge Karen McNaught on 6/26/2023: Plaintiff Catherine Carrell's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis #2 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section is ALLOWED. The plaintiff's application was submitted under penalty of perjury and sufficiently demonstrates the plaintiff should be excused from paying the filing fee. (BL) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Catherine Carrell. Responses due by 7/5/2023. (DM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Catherine Carrell. Responses due by 7/5/2023. (DM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Catherine Carrell. (DM) |
| NOTICE of Social Security Complaint filed. Commissioner of Social Security answer due on 8/21/2023. (DM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
