Sours v. Becton, Dickinson and Company et al
| Jay W. Sours |
| Becton, Dickinson and Company, C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Access Systems, et al., Becton Dickinson and Company and C R Bard Inc |
| 3:2023cv03231 |
| July 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colleen R Lawless |
| Karen L McNaught |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MDL Remark: Case transferred from Illinois Central has been opened in DISTRICT OF ARIZONA as case 2:23-cv-01706, filed 08/21/2023. (JJK) |
| MDL Remark: MINUTE ORDER - TO INVOLVED CLERKS - Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-1) Finalized on 8/18/23. Please see pleading (3 in ALS/1:23-cv-00278, 3 in CAE/1:23-cv-01111, 11 in CAE/2:23-cv-01394, 3 in CAE/2:23-cv-01520, 9 in CAN/3:23-cv-03147, 8 in CO/1:23-cv-01669, 3 in CO/1:23-cv-01887, 3 in FLM/6:23-cv-01410, 3 in FLM/8:23-cv-01646, 5 in IAS/4:23-cv-00214, 3 in IAS/4:23-cv-00264, 3 in ILC/1:23-cv-01269, 3 in ILC/3:23-cv-03231, 5 in ILN/1:23-cv-04141, 3 in ILN/1:23-cv-04703, 3 in ILS/3:23-cv-02560, 71 in MDL No. 3081, 5 in MOE/4:23-cv-00809, 5 in MOE/4:23-cv-00847, 3 in MOW/4:23-cv-00513, 3 in MOW/6:23-cv-03226, 3 in NCE/5:23-cv-00383, 5 in NCM/1:23-cv-00574, 3 in NCM/1:23-cv-00597, 3 in NE/8:23-cv-00314, 14 in NJ/2:23-cv-02859, 3 in NYW/1:23-cv-00753, 5 in PAM/1:23-cv-01088, 5 in SD/4:23-cv-04111, 3 in TNM/3:23-cv-00745, 3 in TNW/2:23-cv-02435, 3 in TNW/2:23-cv-02442, 3 in TXE/4:23-cv-00672, 3 in TXE/9:23-cv-00124, 8 in TXN/3:23-cv-01463, 7 in TXS/4:23-cv-02356, 3 in WAE/1:23-cv-03109, 3 in WAW/3:23-cv-05653, 3 in WAW/3:23-cv-05670).As stipulated in Rule 7.1(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to oppose the transfer. The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the order is directed to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the D. Arizona for filing. The Panel governing statute, 28 U.S.C. 1407, requires that the transferee clerk transmit a certified copy of the Panel order to transfer to the clerk of the district court from which the action is being transferred. Signed by Clerk of the Panel Tiffaney D. Pete on 8/18/2023. Associated Cases: MDL No. 3081 et al. (JC) (DM) |
| MDL Remark: CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER FINALIZED (CTO-1) - 38 action(s) re: pldg. (1 in ALS/1:23-cv-00278, 1 in CAE/1:23-cv-01111, 9 in CAE/2:23-cv-01394, 1 in CAE/2:23-cv-01520, 7 in CAN/3:23-cv-03147, 6 in CO/1:23-cv-01669, 1 in CO/1:23-cv-01887, 1 in FLM/6:23-cv-01410, 1 in FLM/8:23-cv-01646, 3 in IAS/4:23-cv-00214, 1 in IAS/4:23-cv-00264, 1 in ILC/1:23-cv-01269, 1 in ILC/3:23-cv-03231, 3 in ILN/1:23-cv-04141, 1 in ILN/1:23-cv-04703, 1 in ILS/3:23-cv-02560, 66 in MDL No. 3081, 3 in MOE/4:23-cv-00809, 3 in MOE/4:23-cv-00847, 1 in MOW/4:23-cv-00513, 1 in MOW/6:23-cv-03226, 1 in NCE/5:23-cv-00383, 3 in NCM/1:23-cv-00574, 1 in NCM/1:23-cv-00597, 1 in NE/8:23-cv-00314, 12 in NJ/2:23-cv-02859, 1 in NYW/1:23-cv-00753, 3 in PAM/1:23-cv-01088, 3 in SD/4:23-cv-04111, 1 in TNM/3:23-cv-00745, 1 in TNW/2:23-cv-02435, 1 in TNW/2:23-cv-02442, 1 in TXE/4:23-cv-00672, 1 in TXE/9:23-cv-00124, 6 in TXN/3:23-cv-01463, 5 in TXS/4:23-cv-02356, 1 in WAE/1:23-cv-03109, 1 in WAW/3:23-cv-05653, 1 in WAW/3:23-cv-05670) Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. Signed by Clerk of the Panel Tiffaney D. Pete on 8/18/2023.Associated Cases: MDL No. 3081 et al. (JC) (DM) |
| Filing 7 Conditional Transfer Order entered by Clerk, MDL Panel, transferring this case to the District of Arizona. This case is terminated. (DM) |
| MDL Remark: CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER FINALIZED (CTO-1) - regarding MDL 3081 of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation directing the transfer of the civil action (23-cv-3231 ILC) to the District of Arizona pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1407. Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. Signed by Clerk of the Panel Tiffaney D. Pete. Judge David G. Campbell is presiding over this litigation. (DM) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendants Bard Access Systems, et al., Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Inc. Responses due by 8/18/2023 (McMillin, Scott) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jay W. Sours. Bard Access Systems, et al. served on 7/27/2023, answer due 8/17/2023. (Faul, James) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jay W. Sours. C R Bard Inc served on 7/27/2023, answer due 8/17/2023. (Faul, James) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jay W. Sours. Becton Dickinson and Company served on 7/27/2023, answer due 8/17/2023. (Faul, James) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Bard Access Systems, et al., Becton, Dickinson and Company, C.R. Bard, Inc.Original summons returned to Plaintiffs' counsel to effectuate service. (HS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bard Access Systems, et al., Becton, Dickinson and Company, C.R. Bard, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-4256314.), filed by Jay W. Sours. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Summons of Bard Access Systems, #3 Exhibit Summons of Becton, Dickinson and Company, #4 Exhibit Summons of C.R. Bard, Inc.)(Faul, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
