Mendoza v. Walker et al
Carlos Mendoza |
Mike Walker, Misty Vaughn, Stephen Mitchell, Samantha Chapman and Dustin D Heuerman |
3:2023cv03275 |
September 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Joe Billy McDade |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Stephen Mitchell and Samantha Chapman on 11/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Chapman Waiver)(KE) |
Filing 7 HIPAA QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 11/6/2023. See written order. (KE) |
Filing 6 MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 11/6/2023. Plaintiff's Motion to Request Counsel #5 is DENIED. Pursuant to its merit review of the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. Sec 1915A, the Court finds that Plaintiff states an Eighth Amendment claim for failure to protect against Defendants Mitchell and Chapman. Additional claims shall not be included in the case above, except in the Court's discretion on motion by a party for good cause shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. Defendants Walker, Vaughn, and Heuerman are TERMINATED. The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The Clerk is directed to set an internal court deadline 60 days from the entry of this Order for the Court to check on the status of service and enter scheduling deadlines. See written order. (KE) |
Prisoner Initial Partial Filing Fee received 11/3/23, in the amount of $ 34.46; receipt number ROC00000519 (ANW) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Joe Billy McDade. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division,100 NE Monroe Street, Peoria, IL 61602.Merit Review Deadline set for 10/2/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(ANW) |
TEXT ORDER Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 9/12/23 granting #3 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $34.46. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court within 30 days of this order. After payment of the initial partial filing fee (or immediately if no funds are available for that payment) the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source, including gifts. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff's account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff's place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office, and to Plaintiff. Prisoner Prepayment due by 10/12/2023 (ANW) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Carlos Mendoza. Responses due by 9/25/2023 (ANW) |
Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Carlos Mendoza (ANW) |
Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Carlos Mendoza.(ANW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Carlos Mendoza.(ANW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.