State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company as subrogee of Ronald D Wilcoxon v. Bell et al
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company as subrogee of Ronald D Wilcoxon |
| Andrew N Bell and United States Postal Service |
| 3:2023cv03334 |
| November 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colleen R Lawless |
| Karen L McNaught |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United States Postal Service, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Original summons returned to Plaintiff Counsel for service. (BL) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Andrew N Bell. Original summons returned to Plaintiff Counsel for service. (BL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew N Bell, United States Postal Service ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILCDC-4343955.), filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company as subrogee of Ronald D Wilcoxon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Federal Cover Sheet, #2 Summons -Andrew Bell, #3 Summons - Atty General, #4 Summons - US Atty, #5 Summons - USPS General Counsel)(Cocagne, Jeffrey) (Attachment 2 replaced on 11/17/2023) (DM). (Attachment 3 replaced on 11/17/2023) (DM). (Attachment 4 replaced on 11/17/2023) (DM). (Attachment 5 replaced on 11/17/2023) (DM). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
