Young v. Gem City Account Service, Inc.
| Zac Young |
| Gem City Account Service, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv03364 |
| December 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colleen R Lawless |
| Karen L McNaught |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Karen L. McNaught on 2/15/2024. See written Order.(BMG)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Karen L. McNaught: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference held 2/15/2024 via telephone. Attorney Marwan Daher present on behalf of Plaintiff. Attorney Stephen F. Hedinger present on behalf of Defendant. Scheduling Order to enter. Parties are reminded of their option to consent to the Magistrate Judge and are to advise the Court if a Settlement Conference is needed. (GL) |
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Zac Young. (Daher, Marwan) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ORDER by US Magistrate Judge Karen McNaught: A Rule 16 conference is set for February 15, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. by telephone. The Court will place the call. The parties shall jointly prepare a proposed scheduling order and file the proposed order by February 9, 2024. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement, they shall file a notification explaining the nature of the disagreement.(BMG) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Gem City Account Service, Inc..(Hedinger, Stephen) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Stephen F Hedinger on behalf of Gem City Account Service, Inc. (Hedinger, Stephen) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Zac Young. Gem City Account Service, Inc. served on 1/4/2024, answer due 1/25/2024. (Daher, Marwan) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Gem City Account Service, Inc.. Original summons returned to Plaintiff Counsel for service. (BL) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Mohammed Omar Badwan on behalf of Zac Young (Badwan, Mohammed) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Marwan Daher on behalf of Zac Young (Daher, Marwan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gem City Account Service, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AILCDC-4369736.), filed by Zac Young. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Daher, Marwan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Young v. Gem City Account Service, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Zac Young | |
| Represented By: | Mohammed Omar Badwan |
| Represented By: | Marwan Daher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gem City Account Service, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Stephen F Hedinger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
