Knott et al v. Frerichs et al
| David Knott and United Asset Recovery Inc |
| Michael W Frerichs, Mario Treto, Jr., Edward R Bonifas, Anthony T Calderone, Dean J Gluth, Anne M Gruber, Tony Majka, David Pack, Margaret A Daley, Scott E Penney, James C Taff, Cortney Anderson Wascher and Amy Lipkis |
| 3:2024cv03067 |
| March 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colleen R Lawless |
| Karen L McNaught |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Robert Johnson on behalf of David Knott, United Asset Recovery Inc (Johnson, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by United Asset Recovery Inc. (Knight, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Edward R Bonifas, Anthony T Calderone, Margaret A Daley, Michael W Frerichs, Dean J Gluth, Anne M Gruber, Amy Lipkis, Tony Majka, David Pack, Scott E Penney, James C Taff, Mario Treto, Jr, Cortney Anderson Wascher ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AILCDC-4428144.), filed by United Asset Recovery Inc, David Knott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons, #13 Summons, #14 Summons)(Knight, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
