Madeker v. State of Illinois et al
| Brett M Madeker |
| Rachael Russell, Luke Dunaway, Rita Gruhl, John Durbin, Fritz Kraemer, Jennica Sefton, Ashley Hicks, Junior Williams, Erich Kraemer, Jared Morrison, William Koonce, Betty Williams, Jeremy Durbin, State of Illinois and Robin Elam |
| 3:2024cv03296 |
| October 18, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Springfield Office |
| Karen L McNaught |
| Sue E Myerscough |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE. (JS)
|
|
Filing 4
OPINION AND ORDER entered by District Judge Sue E Myerscough on 11/1/2024. Plaintiff's action (d/e #1 ) is DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (d/e #2 ) and Motion to Request Counsel (d/e #3 ) are DENIED as moot. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to close the case and enter judgment accordingly. See full written Opinion and Order.(JS)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Brett M Madeker. Responses due by 11/1/2024. (SB)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Brett M Madeker. Responses due by 11/1/2024. (SB)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Brett M Madeker. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SB)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
