Miller v. Roberts et al
Plaintiff: Sharonda Miller
Defendant: Abagail Roberts and Ashley Ulery
Case Number: 3:2025cv03078
Filed: March 21, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Colleen R Lawless
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2025 Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion re #16 MOTION for Summary Judgment on the issue of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and Memorandum of Law in Support filed by Plaintiff Sharonda Miller. (DW) (Main Document 18 replaced on 9/9/2025) (DW).
August 26, 2025 Filing 17 RULE 56 NOTICE entered re #16 MOTION for Summary Judgment on the issue of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and Memorandum of Law in Support (DW)
August 25, 2025 Filing 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment on the issue of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and Memorandum of Law in Support by Defendants Abagail Roberts, Ashley Ulery. Responses due by 9/15/2025 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Perez Velazquez, Maira)
August 18, 2025 Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment on Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies by Defendants Abagail Roberts, Ashley Ulery. Responses due by 9/2/2025 (Perez Velazquez, Maira)
August 18, 2025 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 8/18/2025. Defendants filed a Second Motion for Extension of Time #15 requesting an additional 7 days to file a motion for summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies. Defendants' Motion #15 is GRANTED. Defendants are directed to file their motion for summary judgment on exhaustion on or before September 2, 2025, as the requested extension of September 1, 2025, is a federal holiday. (VH)
July 17, 2025 Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motion for Summary Judgment on Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies by Defendants Abagail Roberts, Ashley Ulery. Responses due by 7/31/2025 (Perez Velazquez, Maira)
July 17, 2025 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 7/17/2025. Defendants filed a Motion for Extension of Time #14 requesting additional time to file a motion for summary judgment on exhaustion of administrative remedies. Defendants' Motion #14 is GRANTED. Defendants are directed to file a motion for summary judgment on exhaustion by August 18, 2025. (SAG)
June 17, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER. Discovery due by 12/17/2025. Motions due by 3/17/2026. Entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 6/17/2025. See full written Order. (Attachments: #1 Consent Packet)(VH)
June 16, 2025 Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Abagail Roberts, Ashley Ulery.(Perez Velazquez, Maira)
May 12, 2025 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Maira Perez Velazquez on behalf of A. Roberts (Perez Velazquez, Maira)
April 28, 2025 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Maira Perez Velazquez on behalf of. Ulery (Perez Velazquez, Maira)
April 23, 2025 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Sharonda Miller.. Ulery waiver sent on 4/17/2025, answer due 6/16/2025. (DW)
April 18, 2025 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Sharonda Miller. A. Roberts waiver sent on 4/17/2025, answer due 6/16/2025. (DW)
April 17, 2025 Filing 7 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to A. Roberts and. Ulery on 4/17/2025. (JS)
April 16, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 HIPAA QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 4/16/2025. SEE WRITTEN ORDER. (SAG)
April 16, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 4/16/2025. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1) According to the Court's Merit Review of Plaintiff's Complaint under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915A, this case shall proceed on an Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendant A. Roberts and a failure-to- intervene claim against Defendant Ulery regarding the alleged incident on March 22, 2023. Additional claims shall not be included in the case above, except in the Court's discretion on motion by a party for good cause shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG) (Main Document 5 replaced on 4/16/2025) (SAG).
April 14, 2025 Prisoner Initial Partial Filing Fee received 4/14/25, in the amount of $ 97.31; receipt number ROC400001201 (ANW)
April 1, 2025 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 4/1/2025. Due to District Judge James E. Shadid's retirement, this case is reassigned to District Judge Colleen R. Lawless for further proceedings.
March 21, 2025 Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Sharonda Miller (ANW)
March 21, 2025 Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Sharonda Miller.(ANW)
March 21, 2025 Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge James Shadid. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division,100 NE Monroe Street, Peoria, IL 61602.Merit Review Deadline set for 4/10/2025. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(ANW)
March 21, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Sharonda Miller.(ANW)
March 21, 2025 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 3/21/25 granting #3 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $69.31. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court within 30 days of this order. After payment of the initial partial filing fee (or immediately if no funds are available for that payment) the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source, including gifts. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff's account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff's place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office, and to Plaintiff. Prisoner Prepayment due by 4/21/2025(ANW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Miller v. Roberts et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharonda Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Abagail Roberts
Represented By: Maira Perez Velazquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ashley Ulery
Represented By: Maira Perez Velazquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?