Maxwell et al v. Illinois Department of Children and Family Services et al
| Kacie Maxwell and Dana Poindexter |
| Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Missouri Department of Children and Family Services, Blake Heltsley, Chauncey Parker, Erin Mattson, Barbara Adams, Andrew Affrunti, Jessica Henderck, Stacie East, Angelique Maxwell, Kim Bradley, Janice Wydman, Sara Lyerla-Waka, Caroline Moyers, Heather Robeck, Jessie Robeck, Sonja Robeck, Kaylee Anderson, Emily Anderson, Mid-Minnesota Leagl Aid and Jacob McGennius |
| 3:2025cv03247 |
| August 25, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colleen R Lawless |
| Douglas J Quivey |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
MOTION for Service of Process by the United States Marshals by Plaintiff Kacie Maxwell. Responses due by 11/3/2025. (BL)
|
Filing 16
Opinion entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 10/20/2025. Plaintiffs' Motion to Reinstate Counts (d/e #9 )is DENIED. SEE WRITTEN ORDER. (BL)
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 10/20/2025: Before the Court is Plaintiff Maxwell's Motion for Voluntarily Dismissal of Co-Plaintiff Poindexter without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). (Doc. #12 ). The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Rule 41(a)(2), do not allow for one plaintiff to dismiss the cause of action of another plaintiff. Thus, the Motion, (Doc. #12 ), is DENIED. If Plaintiff Poindexter wants to dismiss her case against Defendants, she must file a motion she signs. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. (BL)
|
Filing 15
RULE 12(C) NOTICE entered re #12 MOTION to Dismiss to Plaintiff Dana Poindexter. (BL)
|
Filing 14
RULE 12(C) NOTICE entered re #12 MOTION to Dismiss to Plaintiff Kacie Maxwell. (BL)
|
Filing 13
MOTION FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS BY U.S. MARSHALS AND MOTION TO CORRECT DEFENDANT'S NAME by Plaintiff Kacie Maxwell. Responses due by 10/21/2025 (JJK)
|
Filing 12
MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CO-PLAINTIFF DANA POINDEXTER WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Plaintiff Kacie Maxwell. Responses due by 10/21/2025 (JJK)
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 9/22/25: Before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions and Motion to Amend Complaint. (Doc. #11 ). Plaintiffs seek sanctions against Defendants Parker, Adams, Mattson, and Affrunti arising from a wardship petition in 25-JA-5 (Montgomery Co.). Plaintiffs, however, have not yet served any of the Defendants and any of the complained about conduct occurred before this Court had jurisdiction over them. Moreover, the Court has invoked the Younger abstention doctrine and this Court is not going to interfere with any of the state court proceedings to include 25-JA-5. (9-2-25 Order). Thus, the Motion as it relates to sanctions, is DENIED. The Motion as it relates to seeking leave to file an amended complaint is DENIED at this time with leave to refile, if needed, after Plaintiffs serve all of the Defendants with the existing Complaint and all of the Defendants answer or otherwise respond. Plaintiffs are also reminded that they should not combine multiple motions in one motion. (BL) Modified on 9/22/2025 to correct a clerical error. (BL)
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Sanctions by Plaintiffs Kacie Maxwell, Dana Poindexter. Responses due by 10/6/2025. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K)(BL)
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Dana Poindexter. Responses due by 9/30/2025. (BL)
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Reinstate Counts I, II, and III by Plaintiffs Kacie Maxwell, Dana Poindexter. Responses due by 9/30/2025. (BL)
|
Filing 8
ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J Quivey on 9/15/2025: Plaintiffs Maxwell and Poindexter's Joint Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, (Doc. #2 ) is granted as to Plaintiff Maxwell and denied as to Plaintiff Poindexter, Motion for Protective Order and For Service of Process by U.S. Marshal, (Doc. #5 ) is denied, and a Motion to File Complaint and Confidential Documents Under Seal, (Doc. #6 ) is denied. The Motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. SEE WRITTEN ORDER. (BL)
|
Filing 7
OPINION entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 9/2/2025. The Court declines to exercise jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' constitutional claims. Counts I, II, and III are DISMISSED without prejudice and Plaintiffs' Motion for Stay Order and Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. (Doc. #3 ). See written Order. (BMG)
|
Filing 6
MOTION to to File Complaint and Confidential Documents Under Seal by Plaintiffs Kacie Maxwell, Dana Poindexter. Responses due by 9/8/2025. (BL)
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Protective Order and Service of Process by U.S. Marshal by Plaintiffs Kacie Maxwell, Dana Poindexter. Responses due by 9/8/2025. (BL)
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM re #3 MOTION for Stay Order and Preliminary Injunction by Kacie Maxwell, Dana Poindexter. (BL)
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Stay Order and Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiffs Kacie Maxwell, Dana Poindexter. Responses due by 9/8/2025. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(BL)
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiffs Kacie Maxwell, Dana Poindexter. Responses due by 9/8/2025. (BL)
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Dana Poindexter, Kacie Maxwell. (Attachments: #1 Decleration of Kacie Maxwell, #2 Decleration of Dana Poindexter, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons)(BL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.