Jenkins v. Farrington et al
| Torry Jenkins |
| Tiona Farrington, Natasha Dillard, LaToya Hughes and Illinois Department of Corrections |
| 3:2025cv03269 |
| September 12, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colleen R Lawless |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT entered in a civil case (SAG) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 10/23/2025. On September 12, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff to either pay the $405 filing fee or Petition the Court to proceed informa pauperis using the provided long-form application, which was sent to Plaintiff at his Chicago, Illinois, address and not returned as undeliverable. Plaintiff has neither complied nor sought an extension of time to comply with the Court's Order before expiration of the October 15, 2023, deadline. Accordingly, Plaintiff's case is dismissed without prejudice. See Dorsey v. Varga, 55 F.4th 1094, 1104 (7th Cir. 2022) ("A district court has inherent power to manage its docket, which includes that power to dismiss a case for 'failure to comply with valid orders,' a category of dismissal for failure to prosecute." (quoting Thomas v. Wardell, 951 F.3d 854, 862 (7th Cir. 2020).(SAG)
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 9/15/2025. Plaintiff, who resides in Chicago, Illinois, has filed a Complaint #1 , a Petition to Proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), and a Motion for Counsel #5 . The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff the Court's Long Form IFP application. Plaintiff has thirty days from the entry of the Court's Order to pay the $405 filing fee or Petition the Court to proceed IFP using the provided long form. The Court informs Plaintiff that any material misrepresentations of his financial status will result in the dismissal of his case with prejudice. Accordingly, the Court strikes Plaintiff's short form IFP Petition #3 . (KE)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Torry Jenkins. Responses due by 9/26/2025 (KE) |
| Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Torry Jenkins (KE) |
| Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Torry Jenkins.(KE) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colleen Lawless. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Springfield Division, 600 E Monroe, Springfield,IL 62701.Merit Review Deadline set for 10/2/2025. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(KE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Torry Jenkins. (Attachments: #1 USM 285 Form, #2 Profile Info Form, #3 Envelope)(KE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 10/23/2025. On September 12, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff to either pay the $405 filing fee or Petition the Court to proceed informa pauperis using the provided long-form application, which was sent to Plaintiff at his Chicago, Illinois, address and not returned as undeliverable. Plaintiff has neither complied nor sought an extension of time to comply with the Court's Order before expiration of the October 15, 2023, deadline. Accordingly, Plaintiff's case is dismissed without prejudice. See Dorsey v. Varga, 55 F.4th 1094, 1104 (7th Cir. 2022) ("A district court has inherent power to manage its docket, which includes that power to dismiss a case for 'failure to comply with valid orders,' a category of dismissal for failure to prosecute." (quoting Thomas v. Wardell, 951 F.3d 854, 862 (7th Cir. 2020).(SAG)