Allen v. National Association of Postal Supervisors NAPS, Branch 255
Plaintiff: Roshanda Allen
Defendant: National Association of Postal Supervisors NAPS, Branch 255
Case Number: 3:2025cv03272
Filed: September 16, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Colleen R Lawless
Referring Judge: Eric I Long
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2026 Filing 17 RESPONSE to Motion re #16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Defendant National Association of Postal Supervisors NAPS, Branch 255. (Transit, Anna)
March 2, 2026 Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Plaintiff Roshanda Allen. Responses due by 3/16/2026. (SB)
February 3, 2026 Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's #13 MOTION TO DISMISS by Plaintiff Roshanda Allen. Responses due by 2/17/2026 (JA)
January 21, 2026 Filing 14 RULE 12(C) NOTICE entered re #13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (JA)
January 21, 2026 Filing 13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant National Association of Postal Supervisors NAPS, Branch 255. Responses due by 2/4/2026 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2, #3 Exhibit Ex. 3, #4 Exhibit Ex. 4)(Transit, Anna)
December 30, 2025 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 12/30/2025: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to complaint #11 is GRANTED for the reasons stated in the motion. Defendant's response to Plaintiff's amended complaint is now due on 1/21/2026. (JA)
December 29, 2025 Filing 12 Proposed Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time to Respond by National Association of Postal Supervisors NAPS, Branch 255. (Transit, Anna) Modified on 1/2/2026 to correct docket text from "Proposed Pretrial Order". Case Participant designation for document restrictions removed (JJK).
December 29, 2025 Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Defendant National Association of Postal Supervisors NAPS, Branch 255. Responses due by 1/21/2026 (Transit, Anna)
December 17, 2025 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Roshanda Allen. National Association of Postal Supervisors NAPS, Branch 255 served on 12/10/2025, answer due 12/31/2025. (RES)
November 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 11/19/25 granting #4 Motion for Leave to File; and granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. SEE FULL ORDER. (JA)
November 19, 2025 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to National Association of Postal Supervisors NAPS, Branch 255. (JA)
November 18, 2025 Filing 7 USM 285 form filed by Roshanda Allen. (JA)
November 5, 2025 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 11/5/2025. In response to the Court's 10/14/25 Order, Plaintiff submitted two summonses: one for the named Defendant National Association of Postal Supervisors and one for David Denosky, who is not a named defendant. Plaintiff failed to provide the USM-285 form for Defendant National Association of Postal Supervisors. The Court directs the Clerk to provide Plaintiff with the USM-285 form. Plaintiff has 14 days to submit the completed form. Plaintiff should not submit a USM-285 form for David Denosky as he is not a named defendant. (JA)
November 3, 2025 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against National Association of Postal Supervisors NAPS, Branch 255, filed by Roshanda Allen. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(JA)
October 14, 2025 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 10/14/2025. Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint #4 and a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Paupers #5 . To be considered, Plaintiff must supply the Court with completed summons and U.S. Marshals service forms (USM-285). Plaintiff has not yet submitted the summons or USM-285 forms. Therefore, Plaintiff must fill out a summons and USM-285 forms for each defendant being sued. Failure of Plaintiff to complete and return the forms within twenty-one (21) days will result in summary dismissal of the complaint, without prejudice. (JA)
October 10, 2025 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Roshanda Allen. Responses due by 10/24/2025 (JA)
September 25, 2025 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Roshanda Allen. Responses due by 10/9/2025 (JA)
September 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long on 9/22/25 denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff may refile her Motion with further explanation regarding both income and expenses, or Plaintiff must pay the filing fee. Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (#2) is denied with leave to refile, filling the form out in its entirety, within 21 days. Failure to do so or pay the filing fee within 21 days will result in dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER. (JA)
September 16, 2025 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT. This case and the corresponding hearings are reassigned to Magistrate Judge Eric I. Long for further proceedings. Entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 9/16/25. (JA)
September 16, 2025 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER OF RECUSAL entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 9/16/2025: Judge Quivey disqualifies and recuses himself from participation in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 455(a). This matter is referred to Chief Judge Darrow for reassignment. (JA)
September 15, 2025 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Roshanda Allen. Responses due by 9/30/2025 (JA) Modified to correct file date on 9/16/2025 (JA).
September 15, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Association of Postal Supervisors NAPS, Branch 255 filed by Roshanda Allen.(JA) Modified to correct file date on 9/16/2025 (JA).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. National Association of Postal Supervisors NAPS, Branch 255
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roshanda Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Association of Postal Supervisors NAPS, Branch 255
Represented By: Anna C. Transit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?