Dickerson v. City of Springfield Illinois et al
| Samuel Dickerson |
| City of Springfield Illinois, State of Illinois and Sangamon County Jail |
| 3:2025cv03301 |
| October 1, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 12/11/2025. Court docket entry #10 sent to plaintiff Samuel Dickerson has been returned as undeliverable. Within 14 days of the entry of this order, plaintiff is directed to show good cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to keep the Court informed of plaintiff's address. Failure to show good cause will result in dismissal of this case. (RES)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 11/24/2025. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration #9 is DENIED. This case will remain closed. See written order. (KE)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Reconsideration re #5 Order by Plaintiff Samuel Dickerson. Responses due by 11/19/2025 (AWR) |
| Filing 8 Second Mail Returned as Undeliverable, re #6 Text Order. (ED) |
| Filing 7 Proposed summons filed by Plaintiff Dickerson. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(ED) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 10/21/25. Court docket entry #5 sent to plaintiff Samuel Dickerson has been returned as undeliverable. Within 14 days of the entry of this order, plaintiff is directed to show good cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to keep the Court informed of plaintiff's address. Failure to show good cause will result in dismissal of this case.(AWR)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 10/6/2025. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #3 is DENIED based upon his "three-strikes" status under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 28 U.S.C. Sec 1915(g). This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based upon Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing fee, in full. All other motions are denied as moot, and all scheduled hearings are vacated. Plaintiff may move the Court to re-open this case, but if he does so, his motion must be accompanied with the $405.00 filling fee required for this case. Otherwise, the Court will not re-open this case. Plaintiff has until October 24, 2025, to pay the filing fee, in full, and to move to re-open this case. Otherwise, this case will remain closed. No judgment to enter. See written order. (KE)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Urbana Division, 201 S Vine Street, Urbana, IL 61802.Merit Review Deadline set for 10/22/2025. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG) |
|
TEXT ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT. This case and the corresponding hearings are reassigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce for further proceedings due to the nature of the case. Entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on 10/2/2025. (SAG)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Samuel L Dickerson. Responses due by 10/15/2025 (AWR) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Samuel L Dickerson. Responses due by 10/15/2025 (AWR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Samuel L Dickerson. (Attachments: #1 proposed summons, #2 USM 285)(AWR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
