Cook v. Redpath et al
Plaintiff: Deante Cook
Defendant: Charles Redpath and City of Springfield, Illinois
Case Number: 3:2025cv03361
Filed: November 21, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Colleen R Lawless
Referring Judge: Douglas J Quivey
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 20 TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 4/27/2026: The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set 4/30/2026 is VACATED. The court adopts the deadlines in the Parties' Report of Rule 26(f) Meeting and Proposed Discovery Plan. (Doc. #19 ). The following deadlines are set: initial disclosures due by 5/5/2026, amendment of pleadings by 6/19/2026, additional parties joined by 6/19/2026, fact discovery closes 2/26/2027, Plaintiff discloses experts by 3/26/2027, Plaintiff discloses expert reports by 3/26/2027, Plaintiff's experts deposed by 4/9/2027, Defendant discloses experts by 4/16/2027, Defendant discloses expert reports by 4/16/2027, Defendant's experts deposed by 4/30/2027, all discovery completed by 5/7/2027 and case dispositive motions by 6/18/2027. A telephonic Status Conference set 9/16/2026 at 10:30 a.m. before Judge Doug Quivey. The parties are to call in to 551-285-1373 then enter meeting ID 160 363 06109. (RES)
April 24, 2026 Filing 19 DISCOVERY PLAN - PROPOSED/Report of Rule 26(f)Planning Meeting by City of Springfield, Illinois, Charles Redpath. (Hogue, Robert)
April 21, 2026 Filing 18 PDF with attached Audio File. Court Date & Time [04/21/2026 11:01:20 AM]. File Size [ 4076 KB ]. Run Time [ 00:08:29 ]. (admin).
April 21, 2026 Filing 17 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Douglas J. Quivey. Status Conference held on 4/21/2026 via telephone. Attorney Monroe D. McWard present on behalf of Plaintiff. Attorney Robert V. Hogue, III present on behalf of Defendants. Discussed status with parties submitting discovery plan. Hearing adjourned. (Tape #SP-C 11:01 AM.) (GL)
April 17, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 16 TEXT ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J Quivey on 4/17/2026. Due to a conflict with the Court's calendar, the April 20, 2026 Status Conference is reset on April 21, 2026 at 11:00 a.m. The parties are to call in to 551-285-1373 then enter meeting ID 160 363 06109.(AEJ)
April 17, 2026 Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Status Conference set for 4/21/2026 at11:00 AM in via telephone before Magistrate Judge Douglas J Quivey. (AEJ)
April 1, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J Quivey on 4/1/2026. This matter is scheduled for a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference by personal appearance before U.S. Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on April 30, 2026, at 9:45 a.m., Courtroom 3, U.S. Courthouse, 600 Monroe, Springfield, Illinois. If an agreed discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(3) is filed seven days before the hearing, the Court will adopt the schedule and vacate the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference. See full written Order. (RES)
March 31, 2026 Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by City of Springfield, Illinois.(Hogue, Robert)
March 17, 2026 Filing 13 PDF with attached Audio File. Court Date & Time [03/04/2026 02:28:57 PM]. File Size [ 4076 KB ]. Run Time [ 00:08:29 ]. (admin).
March 13, 2026 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Deante Cook. City of Springfield, Illinois served on 3/10/2026, answer due 3/31/2026. (McWard, Monroe) Modified on 3/13/2026 to correct event type and set answer deadline (RES).
March 13, 2026 Set/Reset Deadlines: City of Springfield, Illinois answer due 3/31/2026. (RES)
March 5, 2026 Filing 11 Summons Issued as to City of Springfield, Illinois. Returned to counsel to effect service. (RES)
March 5, 2026 Filing 10 NOTICE (McWard, Monroe)
March 4, 2026 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Douglas J. Quivey. Status Conference held on 3/4/2026 via telephone. Attorney Monroe D. McWard present on behalf of Plaintiff. Attorney Robert V. Hogue, III present on behalf of Defendant Charles Redpath. Plaintiff is directed to serve the City of Springfield no later than 3/20/2026. Further status conference is set for 4/20/2026 at 11:00 AM before Judge Douglas J. Quivey via telephone. The parties are to call in to 551-285-1373 then enter meeting ID 160 363 06109. Hearing adjourned. (Tape #SP-C 2:29 PM.) (GL) Modified on 3/4/2026 (GL).
March 2, 2026 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Robert V Hogue, III on behalf of Charles Redpath (Hogue, Robert)
March 2, 2026 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 3/2/2026: A telephonic Status Conference set March 4, 2026, at 2:30 p.m. in front of Judge Doug Quivey. The parties are to call in to 551-285-1373 then enter meeting ID 160 363 06109. (RES)
February 20, 2026 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Deante Cook (McWard, Monroe)
February 20, 2026 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 2/20/2026: On January 6, 2026, the Court warned Plaintiff as it relates to Defendant City of Springfield, that he needed to either file proof of service on Defendant City of Springfield if the City had already been served by January 13, 2026, or, if Defendant City of Springfield had not yet been served, to effectuate service on the City by February 19, 2026. Plaintiff was warned that failure to do either would result in dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The reason Plaintiff was given two alternatives is because Plaintiff filed a document indicating the Defendant City of Springfield had been served, (Doc. #6 ), but the underlying document relates to Defendant Redpath and not to Defendant City of Springfield. It should also be noted that an earlier case making the same allegations, 25-cv-3217, was dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) because Plaintiff Cook failed to timely perfect service. The Court will give Plaintiff ten (10) additional days until March 2, 2026, to either effectuate service on Defendant City of Springfield or show good cause for his failure. If Plaintiff fails to do either, at a minimum, Defendant City of Springfield will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Plaintiff, however, is also put on notice that if he fails to effectuate service, he also runs the risk of dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630 (1962) (explaining district courts have the inherent authority to dismiss a case sua sponte for want of prosecution). The basis of a dismissal with prejudice is the history of this case, what occurred in 25-cv-3217, and the Court taking judicial notice of numerous other cases pending against the City of Springfield in the Central District of Illinois where other plaintiffs have been able to successfully serve the City of Springfield. See e.g. Ettress v. Schmillen, 25-cv-3222.(BMG)
January 7, 2026 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Charles Redpath.(Hampleman, Michael)
January 6, 2026 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 1/6/2026: A review of the docket shows that Plaintiff had Defendant Redpath served on November 24, 2025, and Defendant Redpath's answer was due on December 15, 2025. It appears that Defendant City of Springfield was not served as docket entries #5 and #6 both relate to Defendant Redpath even though docket entry #6 says it is for Defendant City of Springfield. As to Defendant Redpath, district courts have the inherent authority to dismiss a case sua sponte for want of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962). See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, Plaintiff is given until January 20, 2026, to either move for default against Defendant Redpath or show cause for failing to do so. As it relates to Defendant City of Springfield, if Plaintiff has effectuated service on the City of Springfield, he is ordered to file proof of the service by January 13, 2026. If Plaintiff has not served the City of Springfield, he is ordered to do so within 90 days of the date the Complaint was filed, November 21, 2025, or the case will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).(BMG) Modified on 1/7/2026 to fix typographical error (BMG).
November 24, 2025 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Deante Cook. City of Springfield, Illinois served on 11/24/2025, answer due 12/15/2025. (McWard, Monroe)
November 24, 2025 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Deante Cook. (McWard, Monroe)
November 21, 2025 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to City of Springfield, Illinois, Charles Redpath and returned to Attorney to effect service. (Attachments: #1 summons)(AWR)
November 21, 2025 Filing 3 NOTICE summons issued (McWard, Monroe)
November 21, 2025 Filing 2 NOTICE Summons Issued (McWard, Monroe)
November 21, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number BILCDC-4873409.), filed by Deante Cook.(McWard, Monroe)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cook v. Redpath et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deante Cook
Represented By: Monroe D McWard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Redpath
Represented By: Michael Hampleman
Represented By: Robert V Hogue, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Springfield, Illinois
Represented By: Robert V Hogue, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?