Ford v. Jackson et al
| Randall E Ford |
| Amy L Jackson, Marjorie A Bryant, Thomas L Veith, City of Jacksonville Municipal Corp, John Dow, Jane Dow and Bills Towing Company |
| 3:2026cv03004 |
| January 8, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colleen R Lawless |
| Douglas J Quivey |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 70
OBJECTION to 68 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct by Randall E Ford. (FDS)
|
|
Filing 69
OBJECTION to 55 Order on Motion to Strike by Randall E Ford. (AEJ)
|
|
Filing 68
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 5/26/26: Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. #67 ). As it is not clear that the proposed Second Amended Complaint addresses all the issues raised in the pending motions to dismiss, the Motion is DENIED with leave to refile after the Court adjudicates the pending motions to dismiss. (FDS)
|
|
Filing 67
MOTION to for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Randall E Ford. Responses due by 6/8/2026 (Attachments: #1 Second Amended Complaint)(FDS)
|
|
Filing 66
MEMORANDUM re #65 Response to Motion, by Amy L Jackson. (Gershenson, Scott)
|
|
Filing 65
RESPONSE re #34 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and #36 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . Filed as Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendants Jackson's and Veith's Motions to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Randall E Ford. (FDS)
|
|
Filing 64
REPLY to Response to Motion re #36 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Defendant Thomas L Veith. (FDS)
|
|
Filing 63
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 4/28/26: Before the Court is Defendant Veith's Motion for Leave to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. (Doc. #62 ). For the reasons stated, the Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to file Doc. 62-1 as Defendant's Reply.(FDS)
|
|
Filing 62
MOTION for Leave to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by Defendant Thomas L Veith. Responses due by 5/12/2026 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Defendant Thomas L. Veith's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint)(Lee, Brian)
|
|
Filing 61
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 4/27/26: Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Randall Ford's Rule 72(a) Objection to Docket Entries 39, 44, and 46 (Doc. #50 ), in which he objects to Magistrate Judge Quivey's orders granting defendants extensions of time to file responses to docket entry #30 . The Objection (Doc. #50 ) is DENIED for the same reasons this Court identified in its Text Order entered 4/24/2026.(FDS)
|
|
Filing 60
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 4/24/2026: Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Randall Fords Rule 72(a) Objection to Magistrate Judge Quivey's Order Granting Defendants Leave to Amend Affirmative Defenses (Doc. #30 ). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) makes clear that Courts "should freely give leave [to amend a pleading] when justice so requires." Plaintiff's Objection (Doc. #30 ) is DENIED as Judge Quivey's order, which granted leave to amend after striking Defendants' affirmative defenses for failure to provide factual bases, was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). (JPL)
|
|
Filing 59
ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J Quivey on 4/24/2026. Defendants' Motion is GRANTED. Motion, (Doc. #30 ), and Memorandum, (Doc. #32 ), are stricken to the extent they seek summary judgment. Plaintiff is given leave to refile. The remainder of Plaintiff's Motion, (Doc. #30 ), seeking relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, will be addressed in a later order. SEE WRITTEN ORDER. (JPL)
|
|
Filing 58
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 4/23/2026: Before the Court is Defendant Veith's Motion to Withdraw. (Doc. #57 ). For the reasons stated, the Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to terminate Mallory Maag-Holmes as counsel for Defendant Veith. (JPL)
|
|
Filing 57
MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Defendant Thomas L Veith. Responses due by 5/6/2026 (Maag-Holmes, Mallory)
|
|
Filing 56
RESPONSE to Motion re #30 MOTION for Reconsideration, #54 Joint MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support filed by Defendants Marjorie A Bryant, City of Jacksonville Municipal Corp. (Pierce, Charles)
|
|
Filing 55
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 4/21/2026: Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses and Response to Defendant's Amended Answer. (Doc. #47 ). The Motion applies to the Amended Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendants City of Jacksonville and Marjorie A. Bryant. (Doc. #31 ). By local rule, Defendants were required to respond to the motion to strike by April 13, 2026. Local Rule 7.1(B)(2). "If no response is timely filed, the presiding judge will presume there is no opposition to the motion and may rule without further notice to the parties." Local Rule 7.1(B)(2). No opposition, however, does not mean that the Court can disregard the relative merit of the underlying motion. Marcure v. Lynn, 992 F.3d 625, 632 (7th Cir. 2021). Plaintiff seeks to strike four affirmative defenses; (1) failure to exhaust administrative remedies; (2) failure to mitigate damages; (3) statute of limitations; and (4) quasi-prosecutorial immunity. He also asserts certain denials were not made in good faith. Because they cause delay, motions to strike are disfavored. Heller v. Financial, Inc. v. Midway Powder Co., Inc., 883 F.2d 1286, 1294 (7th Cir. 1989). Affirmative defenses will be stricken only when they are insufficient on the face of the pleadings. Id. The Court disagrees with Plaintiff as to three of the four affirmative defenses. It should also be noted as to the last affirmative defense, Defendants are not asserting quasi-prosecutorial immunity they are asserting qualified immunity. The Court finds that all of the affirmative defense except failure to exhaust administrative remedies are sufficient on their face. As to the affirmative defense of failure to exhaust remedies, given the Defendants non-opposition, the Court cannot say that the sufficiency of the defense is clear. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to strike, (Doc. #47 ), is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The first affirmative defense of failure to exhaust administrative remedies is stricken. If Defendants City of Jacksonville and Marjorie A. Bryant want to re-assert it, they are given twenty-one (21) days to file a motion for leave to file an amended answer with an amended answer attached. In the motion, they must provide legal support for why the proposed affirmative defense is valid given the allegations in the Amended Complaint. As to the rest of the motion to strike, it is DENIED. (KAP) Modified on 4/22/2026 to include date order was entered. (RAH).
|
|
Filing 54
Joint MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support by Defendant Thomas L Veith. Responses due by 4/22/2026 (Lee, Brian)
|
|
Filing 53
REPLY to Response to Motion re #34 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Amy L Jackson. (FDS)
|
|
Filing 52
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 4/6/26: Before the Court is Defendant Amy Jackson's Motion for Leave to File Reply. (Doc. #51 ). For the reasons stated, the Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to file Doc. 51-1 and Defendant Jackson's Reply.(FDS)
|
|
Filing 51
MOTION for Leave to File Reply by Defendant Amy L Jackson. Responses due by 4/20/2026 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Reply to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss)(Gershenson, Scott)
|
|
Filing 50
PLAINTIFF'S RULE 72(a) OBJECTIONS TO ECF NOS. 39 , 44 , AND 46 ,AND REQUEST FOR RULING ON PENDING RULE 72(a) OBJECTION AT ECF NO. #30 by Plaintiff Randall E Ford.(AEJ) Modified on 4/1/2026 to clarify the filer (DW).
|
|
Filing 49
RESPONSE to Motion re #34 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Randall E Ford. (RAH)
|
|
Filing 48
RESPONSE to Motion re #36 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Plaintiff Randall E Ford. (RAH)
|
|
Filing 47
MOTION to Strike Affirmative Defenses and Response to #31 Answer to Complaint by Plaintiff Randall E Ford. Responses due by 4/13/2026. (RAH)
|
|
Filing 46
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 3/26/26: Before the Court is Defendant Thomas Veith's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. #45 ). For the reasons stated, the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant Veith has until April 30, 2026, to file his responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order Granting Defendants Leave to Amend Affirmative Defenses Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) & Motion for Summary Judgment on Behalf of Myself, Plaintiff Randall E. Ford. (Doc. #30 ).(FDS)
|
|
Filing 45
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #30 MOTION for Reconsideration by Defendant Thomas L Veith. Responses due by 4/9/2026 (Maag-Holmes, Mallory)
|
|
Filing 44
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 3/25/26: Before the Court is Defendant Amy Jackson's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Alleged Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. #43 ). For the reasons stated, the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant Jackson has until April 30, 2026, to file her responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order Granting Defendants Leave to Amend Affirmative Defenses Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) & Motion for Summary Judgment on Behalf of Myself, Plaintiff Randall E. Ford. (Doc. #30 ).(FDS)
|
|
Filing 43
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #30 MOTION for Reconsideration by Defendant Amy L Jackson. Responses due by 4/8/2026 (Gershenson, Scott)
|
|
Filing 42
REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to United States Corporation Agents, Inc. as agent for Bill's Towing & Recovery, LLC on 3/23/26. (FDS)
|
|
Filing 41
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 3/23/26: Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Default against Defendant Bill's Towing & Recovery, LLC. (Doc. #40 ). The Motion is DENIED. It is not apparent from the returned summons that Robin McFadden, front desk worker and Office Manager, is authorized by law to receive service of process for Defendant Bill's Towing & Recovery, LLC. The Clerk is directed to mail a waiver of summons form, a copy of the complaint, and a copy of this order to Bill's Towing & Recovery, LLC.'s registered agent: United States Corporation Agents, Inc., 980 N. Michigan Ave, Suite 1085, Chicago, IL 60611-4525.(FDS)
|
|
Filing 40
MOTION for Entry of Default Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a) by Plaintiff Randall E Ford. Responses due by 4/6/2026 (FDS)
|
|
Filing 39
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 3/20/26: Before the Court is Defendants City of Jacksonville and Marjorie A. Bryant's Motion for Extension of Time. (Doc. #37 ). For the reasons stated therein, the Motion is GRANTED. Defendants have until April 30, 2026, to file their responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order Granting Defendants Leave to Amend Affirmative Defenses Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) & Motion for Summary Judgment on Behalf of Myself, Plaintiff Randall E. Ford. (Doc. #30 ). (JPL) Modified on 3/20/2026 to include correct language (JPL).
|
|
Filing 38
RULE 12(C) NOTICE entered re #34 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and #36 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (JPL)
|
|
Filing 37
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Defendants Marjorie A Bryant, City of Jacksonville Municipal Corp. Responses due by 4/30/2026 (Pierce, Charles)
|
|
Filing 36
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Thomas L Veith. Responses due by 4/3/2026 (Maag-Holmes, Mallory)
|
|
Filing 35
MEMORANDUM In Support re #34 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by Amy L Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Gershenson, Scott)
|
|
Filing 34
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by Defendant Amy L Jackson. Responses due by 4/3/2026 (Gershenson, Scott)
|
|
Filing 33
Exhibits re #30 MOTION for Reconsideration by Randall E Ford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(FDS)
|
|
Filing 32
MEMORANDUM re #30 Motion for Reconsideration/Motion for Summary Judgment by Randall E Ford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(FDS)
|
|
Filing 31
AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by City of Jacksonville Municipal Corp.(Pierce, Charles)
|
|
Filing 30
MOTION for Reconsideration/Motion for Summary Judgment (filed as Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order Granting Defendants Leave to Amend Affirmative Defenses Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.72(a) and Motion for Summary Judgment on Behalf of Myself, Plaintiff Randall E. Ford) by Plaintiff Randall E Ford. Responses due by 3/30/2026 (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(FDS)
|
|
Filing 29
NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Mallory Maag-Holmes on behalf of Thomas L Veith (Maag-Holmes, Mallory)
|
|
Filing 28
NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Haley Spiewak on behalf of Amy L Jackson (Spiewak, Haley)
|
|
Filing 27
NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Haley Spiewak on behalf of Amy L Jackson (Spiewak, Haley)
|
|
Filing 26
ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J Quivey on 3/11/26: Ford's Motion to Strike Defendants' Affirmative Defenses, (Doc #24 ), is GRANTED. Defendants City of Jacksonville and Bryant have fourteen days to file an Amended Answer. The Court also notes that it appears Ford's motion might have been drafted with the assistance of artificial intelligence. The Court cautions Ford that litigants use artificial intelligence at their own risk, and that obligations set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 apply to both attorneys and pro se litigants alike. The Clerk is directed to strike (Doc. #15 ). Defendants City of Jacksonville and Majorie A. Bryant are given leave to file an amended answer by March 25, 2026. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER. (FDS)
|
|
Filing 25
RESPONSE to Motion re #24 MOTION to Strike Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendant City of Jacksonville Municipal Corp. (Pierce, Charles)
|
|
Filing 24
MOTION to Strike Defendants' Affirmative Defenses by Plaintiff Randall E Ford. Responses due by 3/20/2026.(BMG)
|
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 3/3/26: Before the Court is Defendant Thomas L. Veith's Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. (Doc. #23 ). For the reasons stated, the Motion is GRANTED. Defendants have until March 20, 2026, to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint. (FDS)
|
|
Filing 23
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Thomas L Veith. Responses due by 3/16/2026 (Lee, Brian)
|
|
Filing 22
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Thomas L Veith. (Lee, Brian)
|
|
Filing 21
NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Brian Daniel Lee on behalf of Thomas L Veith (Lee, Brian)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J Quivey on 3/2/26. Plaintiff's Motion to Request Counsel #16 is DENIED. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER. (FDS)
|
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 2/25/26: Before the Court is Defendant Amy Jackson's Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. (Doc. #19 ). For the reasons stated, the Motion is GRANTED. Defendants have until March 20, 2026, to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint. (FDS)
|
|
Filing 19
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #7 Amended Complaint by Defendant Amy L Jackson. Responses due by 3/10/2026 (Gershenson, Scott)
|
|
Filing 18
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Amy L Jackson. (Gershenson, Scott)
|
|
Filing 17
NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Scott Gershenson on behalf of Amy L Jackson (Gershenson, Scott)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Randall E Ford. Responses due by 3/6/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(JPL)
|
|
Filing 15
ANSWER to Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by City of Jacksonville Municipal Corp.(Pierce, Charles)
|
|
Filing 14
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Marjorie A Bryant, City of Jacksonville Municipal Corp. (Pierce, Charles)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Charles A Pierce on behalf of Marjorie A Bryant, City of Jacksonville Municipal Corp (Pierce, Charles)
|
|
Filing 12
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Randall E Ford. Bills Towing Company served on 2/11/2026, answer due 3/4/2026; Marjorie A Bryant served on 2/11/2026, answer due 3/4/2026; Amy L Jackson served on 2/11/2026, answer due 3/4/2026; Thomas L Veith served on 2/11/2026, answer due 3/4/2026. (JPL)
|
|
Filing 11
Summons Issued as to Bills Towing Company. (FDS) (Main Document 11 replaced on 2/11/2026) (FDS).
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of USM 285 as to Bills Towing Company received from Plaintiff Randall E. Ford. (FDS)
|
|
Filing 9
Summons Issued as to Marjorie A Bryant, Amy L Jackson, and, Thomas L Veith. (FDS)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of USM 285 received from Plaintiff Randall E. Ford. (FDS)
|
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 2/10/26: Before the Court is Randall Ford's ("Ford") Motion to Request Counsel. (Doc. #5 ). Unlike in criminal cases, parties in civil cases have no right to a court appointed lawyer. See Zarnes v. Rhodes, 64 F.3d 285, 288 (7th Cir. 1995). However, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1), a court may try to recruit a lawyer for a party who cannot afford one. Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 653 (7th Cir. 2007). In determining whether to recruit an attorney, "the court must first consider whether the indigent defendant has made a reasonable attempt to obtain counsel and, second whether the plaintiff is capable of litigating his case, given its difficulty." Austin v. Hansen et al., 139 F.4th 604, 606 (7th Cir. 2025) citing Pruitt, 503 F.3d at 654-55. Regarding the first question, Ford failed to complete Paragraph 2 of the Motion, which requires the requesting party to list the attorneys and/or organizations he contacted seeking representation in this case. Showing an attempt to retain counsel typically requires writing to several lawyers and attaching the responses. Therefore, because Ford has not made a reasonable attempt to obtain counsel, the Motion is DENIED with leave to refile a complete motion with special attention paid to Paragraphs 2 and 6.(FDS)
|
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 1/23/26: Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a Second Amended Complaint #7 following entry of Judgment and dismissal of this case with prejudice #6 . In his Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff asks this Court to accept the pleading as his "formal amended complaint" because he believes he "presented the information to the court incorrectly" presumably in his First Amended Complaint #4 . The Court construes Plaintiff's request as a motion filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) to relieve him of the final judgment because of "mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect." Because Plaintiff is without counsel, the Second Amended Complaint was filed within the Court's 21-day amended pleading deadline #3 , and granting the motion would result in no prejudice to Defendants, the Court finds that just terms exist to vacate the Judgment and construe Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint as his first amended complaint. Clerk is therefore directed to reopen the case and to STRIKE/VACATE the Judgment #6 , the text order entered on 1/16/2026, and the first Amended Complaint #4 . Clerk is also directed to change docket entry "Second Amended Complaint" #7 to Plaintiff's "Amended Complaint." (FDS)
|
|
Filing 7
AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Randall E Ford.(FDS) Modified on 1/23/2026 to remove "SECOND" (FDS).
|
|
Filing 6
STRICKEN/VACATED PURSUANT TO THE 1/23/26 TEXT ORDER: JUDGMENT entered. (GL) Modified on 1/23/2026 (FDS).
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Randall E Ford. Responses due by 1/30/2026. (JPL)
|
|
STRICKEN/VACATED PURSUANT TO THE 1/23/26 TEXT ORDER: TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 1/16/2026: Pursuant to the Court's Opinion and Order #3 , Plaintiff was given 21 days from the entry of the order to amend his complaint. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint #4 realleges much of the same conclusory allegations in his first complaint #1 , including that the City of Jacksonville and the named defendants conspired against him to violate his rights, while adding that the local police department is a participant in the conspiracy. He asks this Court, in part, to criminally charge the defendants. Because the Amended Complaint failed to cure factual deficiencies and is frivolous, the Court finds that any further amendment would be futile. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). This case is therefore dismissed with prejudice. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff's Motion to Request Counsel #5 is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this case and enter judgment for Defendants. (GL) Modified to include motion #5 denied language on 1/16/2026 (GL). Modified on 1/23/2026 (FDS).
|
|
Filing 4
STRICKEN/VACATED PURSUANT TO THE 1/23/26 TEXT ORDER: AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Randall E Ford.(FDS) Modified on 1/23/2026 (FDS).
|
|
Filing 3
OPINION entered by Judge Colleen R. Lawless on 1/14/26. The Petition for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. #1 ) is Dismissed without Prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court grants Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within 21 days from the entry of this Order. Failure to file an amended complaint within that time will result in dismissal of this case with prejudice. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER. (FDS)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Randall E Ford. Responses due by 1/22/2026 (FDS)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Randall E Ford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(FDS)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
