Bell v. The Knapheide Manufacturing Company
| Michael Bell |
| The Knapheide Manufacturing Company doing business as Knapheide |
| 3:2026cv03102 |
| March 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colleen R Lawless |
| Douglas J Quivey |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J Quivey on 5/15/26. This matter is scheduled for a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference by personal appearance before U.S. Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on June 18, 2026, at 9:45 a.m., Courtroom 3, U.S. Courthouse, 600 Monroe, Springfield, Illinois. If an agreed discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(3) is filed seven days before the hearing, the Court will adopt the schedule and vacate the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference. Failure to timely submit a discovery plan may result in the cancellation of the discovery conference and assessment of costs. An approved format is at Attachment A. See full written Order. (MSH)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by The Knapheide Manufacturing Company.(Alamuddin, Sari) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Robert E. Morelli, III on behalf of Michael Bell (Morelli, Robert) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 4/20/2026: Before the Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Class and Collective Action Complaint. (Doc. #6 ). For the reasons stated, the unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendant has until May 17, 2026, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. (KLC)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Sari M Alamuddin on behalf of The Knapheide Manufacturing Company (Alamuddin, Sari) |
| Filing 7 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by The Knapheide Manufacturing Company. (Alamuddin, Sari) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (Unopposed) by Defendant The Knapheide Manufacturing Company. Responses due by 5/1/2026 (Alamuddin, Sari) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael Bell. The Knapheide Manufacturing Company served on 4/1/2026, answer due 4/22/2026. (Pena, Analyse) |
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT entered by Chief Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 3/30/2026. This case and the corresponding hearings are reassigned to Judge Colleen R. Lawless for further proceedings. (LN)
|
|
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER entered by Chief Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 3/30/2026. When opening this case, Attorney Analyse Guadalupe Pena classified it as seeking to bar or mandate statewide or nationwide enforcement of a state or federal law and, accordingly, it was put into a district-wide assignment pool per Civil Local Rule 40.1(E)(4)(b). But this case does not seek such relief, so it is not subject to district-wide assignment. The Clerk is directed to reassign the case accordingly. (LN)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to The Knapheide Manufacturing Company. Original returned to Plaintiff's attorney. (KLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class and Collective Wage and Hour Claims against The Knapheide Manufacturing Company d/b/a Knapheide ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AILCDC-4955202.), filed by Michael Bell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent to Join Collective Action, #2 Supplement Request for Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pena, Analyse) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
