Simpson v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Michael Anthony Simpson |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security - Office of the General Counsel |
| 3:2026cv03238 |
| July 25, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colleen R Lawless |
| Douglas J Quivey |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Douglas J. Quivey on 7/27/2026: Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. #2 ) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915 is GRANTED for the reasons stated therein. Plaintiff's Application to proceed in forma pauperis was submitted under penalty of perjury and sufficiently demonstrates that the Plaintiff should be excused from paying the filing fee in this action. (DW)
|
| NOTICE of Social Security Complaint filed. Commissioner of Social Security answer due on 9/25/2026. (DW) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael Anthony Simpson. Responses due by 8/10/2026 (Pierre Pierre, Eddy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Michael Anthony Simpson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pierre Pierre, Eddy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
