Knight, II et al v. Beckler et al
Jack Knight, II and Allison Knight |
Dean Beckler and Smithway Motor Xpress Corp |
4:2010cv04039 |
April 15, 2010 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Rock Island Office |
Tazewell |
John A. Gorman |
Joe Billy McDade |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 OPINION & ORDER Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 7/21/10 granting 25 Motion to Dismiss: FOR THE FOREGOING REASON, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED (Doc. 25). Counts 9, 10, 13, and 14 are DISMISSED. (TK, ilcd) |
Filing 24 OPINION AND ORDER Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 7/6/10 taking under advisement 14 Motion to Consolidate Cases; granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction: THIS COURT FINDS that it has subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' claims. However, Plaintiffs' claim that "C.K. was hindered and prevented from attending to usual business and affairs and lost and will lose sums of money which the Plaintiff would have otherwise acquired and earned" (Complaint p.16)is hereby STRICKEN. And, Counts 7, 8, 11, and 12 are DISMISSED for the reasons set forth above. This matter is set for a hearing on the Motion to Consolidate before Magistrate Judge Gorman and the undersigned, in person in Peoria, Illinois on July 22, 2010 at 11:00 AM.. (TK, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.