Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Coyle et al
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation |
Francis J. Coyle, Jr. and Dawn D Coyle |
4:2014cv04078 |
August 29, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Rock Island Office |
Rock Island |
Sara Darrow |
Jonathan E. Hawley |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on July 19, 2017. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff's attorneys' fees, expenses, and court costs are GRANTED and may be added to the final money judgment in the amount of $48,130.12. (RS1, ilcd) |
Filing 26 ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on March 31, 2017. Plaintiff's 10 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, except as to attorney fees, expenses, and court costs. Plaintiff is directed to submit an affidavit and/or documentation providing th e Court with information to determine whether the attorney fees, expenses, and costs incurred were reasonable. Plaintiff must submit such affidavit on or before April 14, 2017 or attorney fees will not be awarded. Judgment is GRANTED in the amount of $891,651.31, plus the $101,758.63 in real estate taxes Plaintiffs move to recover in the 25 Supplemental Motion to Recover Real Estate Tax, which is GRANTED. The total judgment amount is $993,409.94. Additionally, Plaintiffs must submit a proposed order consistent with this order by April 14, 2017. (RS1, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.