United States of America v. Hillcrest Report, Inc. et al
| United States of America |
| Hillcrest Report, Inc., Terri L Kosth, James R Inghram, Lyon Financial Services, Nikki Kintz, Lanum Electric, LLC, Illinois Department of Revenue, Unknown Owners and Non-Record Claimants |
| 4:2015cv04194 |
| November 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Rock Island Office |
| Henry |
| Sara Darrow |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
ORDER entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on November 18, 2019. The United States' 101 objection is SUSTAINED IN PART and OVERRULED IN PART and the Court ADOPTS IN PART and REJECTS IN PART the 100 Report and Recommendation. The 105 Motion for Leave to File a Reply is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to file the [105-1] reply on the docket. The Court defers ruling on the 86 Motion to Approve the Marshal's Report and Confirm Judicial Sale and the 96 Motion to Vacate Marshal� 39;s Sale. The 102 Motion Requesting an Expedited Ruling is GRANTED. The Court sets the matter for an evidentiary hearing on November 25, 2019 at 10:30 a.m. at the United States Courthouse for the Southern District of Iowa located at 131 E. 4th Street Davenport, Iowa 52801. The parties should be prepared to present evidence regarding the value of the property and the amount of indebtedness still secured by the mortgage. (AK, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
