Wilson v. City of Galesburg et al
| Lisa R Wilson |
| City of Galesburg and David W Jones |
| 4:2016cv04025 |
| February 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Rock Island Office |
| Knox |
| Sara Darrow |
| Jonathan E. Hawley |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on May 10, 2018. The 36 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and Wilson's 30 Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint is DENIED. Jones's 49 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, though two c laims remain. Jones is entitled to summary judgment as to the Fourth Amendment claim. With respect to Wilson's equal protection claim and § 1981 claim pursuant to § 1983, Jones did not provide the Court with the applicable law or argument as to why Wilson's claims fail in light of it. The Court will not make these arguments for him. Thus, the suit proceeds with two claims against Jones in his individual capacity remaining. (KML, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on December 22, 2016. Defendants' 3 motion to dismiss is GRANTED, insofar as the claims against Defendant City of Galesburg are DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to terminate the City of Galesburg from the case. (SC, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
