Hardaway v. Sood et al
| Balal Hardaway |
| Kul B Sood, . Ritz, R. Gilliam, Roy Bak, Stephanie Dorethy, Julie Hamos, Daniel Conn, Sue and John Baldwin |
| 4:2016cv04184 |
| September 12, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Rock Island Office |
| Knox |
| James E. Shadid |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
MERIT REVIEW AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 12/12/2016. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO:1) Dismiss Defendants Warden Stephanie Dorethy, Department of Healthcare andFamily Services Representativ e Julie Hamos, Wexford Healthcare RepresentativeDaniel Conn and Illinois Department of Corrections Director John Baldwin forfailure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to by 28 U.S.C. §1915A; 2) Deny Plaintiff's motio ns for appointment of counsel with leave to renew, 5 , 6 ; 3) Deny Plaintiff's motion for a status update as moot. 7 ; 4) Attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures; 5) set an internal court deadline 60 days from the entry of this order for the court to check on the status of service and enter scheduling deadlines and 6) enter the Court's standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.(SL, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.