Scott v. Ore

Scott v. Ore

Plaintiff:	Dennis Scott
Defendant:	Alice Ore
Case Number:	4:2016cv04274
Filed:	December 23, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office:	Rock Island Office
County:	Schuyler
Presiding Judge:	James E. Shadid
Nature of Suit:	Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 3, 2017	Filing 11 OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 4/3/2017. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with the Court's order in Scott v Goddard, 14-3309, and as malicious and for fai lure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(d). All pending motions are denied as moot. 2) Plaintiff is admonished if he continues to file complaints in violation of this order and the November 2, 2015 Orde r in Scott v Goddard, 14-3309, he will face sanctions.3) If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he must file a notice of appeal with this court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). A motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis MUST set forth the issues Plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). SEE FULL WRITTEN OPINION. (JS, ilcd)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 3, 2017

Filing 11 OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 4/3/2017. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with the Court's order in Scott v Goddard, 14-3309, and as malicious and for fai lure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(d). All pending motions are denied as moot. 2) Plaintiff is admonished if he continues to file complaints in violation of this order and the November 2, 2015 Orde r in Scott v Goddard, 14-3309, he will face sanctions.3) If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he must file a notice of appeal with this court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). A motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis MUST set forth the issues Plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). SEE FULL WRITTEN OPINION. (JS, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott v. Ore
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dennis Scott
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Alice Ore
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?