Latko v. Lochard et al
| Edward Latko |
| Hughes Lochard, Lisa Logsdon, Philip Cox, John/Jane 1-10 Does, John/Jane 1-6 Does, James Shumake, John Bozdech, Jose Cris Delrosario, Beth Oeser, Jeffrey P Christy, Muhammad Ashraf, Gabor Matos, Sufyan Said, Amy Durako, Pamela Brodt and John/Jane 1-7 Does |
| 4:2016cv04277 |
| December 27, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Rock Island Office |
| Schuyler |
| Joe Billy McDade |
| Conditions of Confinement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
MERIT REVIEW SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 5/18/2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO: 1) ATTEMPT SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO THE STANDARD PROCEDURES; AND, 2) SET AN INTERNAL COURT DEADLINE 60 DAYS FROM THE ENTRY OFTHIS ORDER FOR THE COURT TO CHECK ON THE STATUS OF SERVICE AND ENTER SCHEDULING DEADLINES.LASTLY, IT IS ORDERED THAT IF A DEFENDANT FAILS TO SIGN AND RETURN A WAIVER OF SERVICE TO THE CLERK WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE WAIVER IS SE NT, THE COURT WILL TAKE APPROPRIATE STEPS TO EFFECT FORMAL SERVICE THROUGH THE U.S. MARSHAL'S SERVICE ON THAT DEFENDANT AND WILL REQUIRE THAT DEFENDANT TO PAY THE FULL COSTS OF FORMAL SERVICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(d)(2). SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
9
MERIT REVEW ORDER entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 6/19/2017. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:1. Plaintiff's petition to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is DENIED, with leave to reassert if he files an amended complaint. The Culbertson Hospital, St. J ohn's Hospital, PrairieCardiovascular Consultant, DHS, Schuyler County EMT, and Emergency Helicopter ServiceDefendants are DISMISSED. 2. Plaintiff will have 30 days in which to file an amended complaint against the remaining defendants. The Comp laint is to be captioned Amended Complaint and to contain all of his claims against the remaining defendants without reference to a prior pleading. He is to identify his particulars claims against the Doe Defendants to aid in their identification. 3. Plaintiff's motions for status 6 and 8 are MOOT. Plaintiff's motion for recruitment of pro bono counsel 5 is DENIED with leave to reassert. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SL, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
