Johnson v. Clayton et al
| Terry C Johnson |
| James Chris Clayton, Gregg Scott and Eric Kunkel |
| 4:2017cv04101 |
| April 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Rock Island Office |
| Schuyler |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Plaintiff's petition to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 3 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion for the Court to Appoint Counsel 5 is DENIED. Defendant Scott is directed to cause to be preserved the following video recordings: "of the plaintiff inside and outside the infirmary room #5 cell from March 30, 2017- April 7, 2017" and the video footage of "fox 2-wing in front of 12 cell while [Plaintiff's] property was being removed on March 31, 2017, at app roximately 2:30 p.m. [un]til the property was all out." (Compl. p. 16.) The Clerk is directed to send this order to the Defendant Scott with paragraph 11 highlighted. The Clerk is to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to th e Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The Clerk is to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. Rule 16 Deadline set for 6/26/2017. SEE WRITTEN OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 04/27/2017. (SKN, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
