Racanelli v. Scott et al
| Joseph R Racanelli |
| Gregg Scott, Eric Kunkel, James C Clayton, Jeremy Seymour, James T Dimas and all other unnamed or unknown persons to have participated in the violations complained herein |
| 4:2017cv04110 |
| May 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Rock Island Office |
| Schuyler |
| James E. Shadid |
| Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
OPINION denying 8 Motion for Reconsideration. Entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 6/26/2018. See full Opinion attached. (RK, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
6
OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 10/5/17. IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff's petition to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. 3 Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The case is closed. If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he must file a notice of appeal with this court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). A motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis MUST set forth the issues Plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER. (FDS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
