Brown v. Scott et al
| Bobby Brown |
| Greg Scott, Chris Clayton, Lynn Shelton, Shan Jumper, Sharlene Carraway, Eugene McAdory, Terry . Williams, Joseph Hankins, Curtis Parson and Joseph Proctor |
| 4:2017cv04211 |
| August 3, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Rock Island Office |
| Schuyler |
| James E. Shadid |
| Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 11/17/2017. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1) Plaintiff's first motion for leave to amend is denied as moot 5 and his second motion for leave to amend is granted pursuant to Feder al Rule of Civil Procedure 15. 6 2) Pursuant to its review of Plaintiff's amended complaint, the Court finds Plaintiff has failed to articulate a federal claim and his complaint is therefore dismissed. 3) The Court will allow Plaintiff one op portunity to file an amended complaint clarifying his claims. Plaintiff MUST follow the directions of the Court and must file his proposed amended complaint within 21 days or on or beforeDecember 1, 2017. If Plaintiff fails to follow the Court 9;s directions or fails to file his proposed second amended complaint on or before the December 1, 2017 deadline, his case will be dismissed with prejudice. 4) The Clerk of the Court is to reset the complaint review deadline for 21 days from this order. See full written Order.(VH, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
