Edmonds v. Aramark, et. al. et al
| Matt Edmonds |
| Aramark, et. al. and Steve Dredge |
| 4:2018cv04001 |
| January 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Rock Island Office |
| Schuyler |
| Sue E. Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MERIT REVIEW OPINION: Case proceeds against Defendants Aramark and Dredge. The clerk is directed to terminate Defendants Vincent, Simpson, Kunkel, Scott, John and Jane Does, and "all other Aramark employees." The 1/16/2018 text order asse ssing the filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§1915(b)(1) is vacated because Plaintiff is not considered a prisoner with in the meaning of that section. The clerk is directed to assess the partial filing fee using the Rushville procedures. Plainti ff's request for a reduction in the filing fee 8 is denied as moot since the Court has vacated that order. The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The Clerk is directed to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. Rule 16 Deadline set for 3/26/2018. SEE WRITTEN MERIT REVIEW OPINION. Entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 01/25/2018.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
