Lafollette v. Knox County et al
| Benjamin Lafollette |
| Jason Marshall, Jackie Arthur, Nathan Messmore, Blaine McKinney, Knox County and David L Clague |
| 4:2019cv04060 |
| March 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sara Darrow |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 6/18/19. The Court adopts the Discovery Plan #19 . Discovery due by 7/27/20. Dispositive Motions due by 8/31/20. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/17/20 at 10:00 AM and Jury Trial set for 1/11/21 at 9:00 AM BOTH HEARINGS in U.S. Courthouse, 131 E 4th Street, Davenport, IA 52801 before Chief Judge Sara Darrow. Pretrial Order due by 11/10/20. The Rule 16 conference set in this matter for 6/21/19 is VACATED. Court stresses the importance of adhering to the schedule and procedures for requests to extend the schedule. If a dispute arises between the parties on any discovery issue, they are directed to promptly confer and, if said conference does not resolve the dispute, to contact the Court within 24 hours to schedule a hearing to resolve the dispute. Parties are reminded of their option to consent to proceed before US Magistrate Judge. See attached form. Parties are reminded of option of Court sponsored mediation/Settlement Conference. Counsel/Parties are reminded of the importance of appearing for hearings scheduled via telephone. Failure appear will result in in-person appearances for all further proceedings(FDS, ilcd) Modified on 6/18/2019 to correct the Jury Trial date from 1/11/20 to 1/11/21. (FDS, ilcd).
|
| Set/Reset Hearings: Jury Trial set for 1/11/2021 at 9:00 AM (Not 1/11/20 as stated in the 6/18/19 Text Order) in U.S. Courthouse, 131 E 4th Street, Davenport, IA 52801 before Chief Judge Sara Darrow. (FDS, ilcd) |
| Filing 19 DISCOVERY PLAN - PROPOSED/Report of Rule 26(f)Planning Meeting by Benjamin Lafollette. (Meyer, Louis) |
|
Filing 18
TEXT ORDER: This case is set for a Rule 16 scheduling conference before Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 6/21/2019 at 11:30 AM via telephone (Court to set up the call). If Counsel are to be reached at a number different than what is listed on the docket sheet, they are directed to phone Judge Hawley's courtroom deputy at 309-671-7117 and confirm the phone number where they may be reached for the call. A discovery plan pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)(3) shall be filed on or before 6/18/2019. The parties may, but are not required to, follow the format of the sample discovery plan set forth as Attachment A to the standing order attached to this text order. The Discovery Plan event may be found in the CM/ECF system within the other Documents category. All counsel must read and be familiar with the standing order attached to this text order prior to their Rule 26(f) planning meeting. Entered by Magistrate Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 5/22/2019. (WG, ilcd)
|
| Filing 17 ANSWER to #1 Complaint AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES by Jackie Arthur, David L Clague, Knox County, Jason Marshall, Blaine McKinney, Nathan Messmore.(Radia, Bhairav) |
| Filing 16 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Benjamin Lafollette. Nathan Messmore waiver sent on 3/19/2019, answer due 5/20/2019. (Meyer, Louis) |
| Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Benjamin Lafollette. Knox County waiver sent on 3/19/2019, answer due 5/20/2019. (Meyer, Louis) |
| Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Benjamin Lafollette. Jason Marshall waiver sent on 3/19/2019, answer due 5/20/2019. (Meyer, Louis) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Benjamin Lafollette. Blaine McKinney waiver sent on 3/19/2019, answer due 5/20/2019. (Meyer, Louis) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Benjamin Lafollette. David L Clague waiver sent on 3/19/2019, answer due 5/20/2019. (Meyer, Louis) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Benjamin Lafollette. Jackie Arthur waiver sent on 3/19/2019, answer due 5/20/2019. (Meyer, Louis) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Daniel P Kiss on behalf of Benjamin Lafollette (Kiss, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Bhairav Radia on behalf of Jackie Arthur, David L Clague, Knox County, Jason Marshall, Blaine McKinney, Nathan Messmore (Radia, Bhairav) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Nathan Messmore on 03/19/2019. (Meyer, Louis) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Blaine McKinney on 03/19/2019. (Meyer, Louis) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Jason Marshall on 03/19/2019. (Meyer, Louis) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Jackie Arthur on 03/19/2019. (Meyer, Louis) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Sheriff David L. Clauge on 03/19/2019. (Meyer, Louis) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Knox County on 03/19/2019. (Meyer, Louis) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Louis J Meyer on behalf of Benjamin Lafollette (Meyer, Louis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0753-3062920.), filed by Benjamin Lafollette. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet)(Meyer, Louis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
