Tosh v. Pritzker et al
| Jason Tosh |
| Mendi Pilger, Henry Hill Correctional Center, Stephanie J Dorethy, Lois Lindorff, MD Catalino Bautista, John Does, Mark N Williams, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Ek, Dr. Steve Meeks, Doctor Ritz, John R Baldwin, Christopher McLaughlin, Dr Garcia, Nurse Jane Doe and Jay Robert Pritzker |
| 4:2019cv04081 |
| April 16, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Stephanie J Dorethy on 6/26/2019. (KE, ilcd) |
Filing 9
HIPAA QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 6/26/2019. See written order.(KE, ilcd)
|
Filing 8
MERIT REVIEW AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 6/26/2019. The clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The clerk is directed to terminate all named Defendants other than Defendant Warden Stephanie Dorethy. The clerk is directed to effect service of process upon Defendant Warden Stephanie Dorethy at the Hill Correctional Center pursuant to the Court's standard procedures. See written order. (Rule 16 Deadline 8/26/2019.) (KE, ilcd)
|
| Filing 7 Letter from Clerk to plaintiff Jason Tosh regarding copies. (KM, ilcd) |
| Filing 6 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Jason Tosh. (KM, ilcd) |
| Filing 5 Response by Jason Tosh to #2 Text Order and requesting copy of local rules. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees/Costs)(KM, ilcd) |
| Filing fee received from plaintiff Jason Tosh: $ 400.00, receipt number 24626008642. (KM, ilcd) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jason Tosh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(SKR, ilcd) |
TEXT ORDER Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/26/19. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file amended complaint #3 is GRANTED. Plaintiff has submitted a document that appears to be an amended complaint, in that, it contains changes to the Complaint that he originally filed with the Court. The Court will treat this second document as an amended complaint, and the Court will conduct a merit review of this amended complaint as soon as possible. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file Plaintiff's document #3 as his amended complaint. (SKR, ilcd)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Jason Tosh. Responses due by 5/9/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibits) (KM, ilcd) |
Filing 2
TEXT ORDER Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/16/19. Plaintiff has filed a Complaint but has not paid the $400 filing fee nor filed a petition to proceed in forma pauperis. Within 21 days of the entry of this order, Plaintiff must pay the $400 filing fee in full or file a petition to proceed in forma pauperis with attached trust fund ledgers for the last 6 months. Failure to comply without good cause will result in dismissal of this case without prejudice, and the Plaintiff will still be responsible for payment of the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1914. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff the forms for proceeding in forma pauperis. ( Other Deadline set for 5/7/2019.) (SKR, ilcd)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jason Tosh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(SKR, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.