Steward et al v. Scott et al
| Philip Wolff and Antwone Steward |
| Shan Jumper and Gregg Scott |
| 4:2019cv04100 |
| May 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER: This Court has instituted a reduced payment procedure for indigent plaintiffs who are institutionalized but who are not prisoners as defined in 28 USC Section 1915(h). A reduced payment is assessed of 50% of such plaintiff's average monthly income for the six months preceding the filing of the complaint (not to exceed the $400 filing fee).Income includes all deposits from any source. The plaintiff Antwone Steward is currently detained at Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility, and is thus subject to the reduced payment procedure. However, the plaintiff's ledgers for the past six months show an average monthly income of $1.00 or less. No reduced filing fee will be assessed. Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 5/29/19. (FDS, ilcd)
|
|
TEXT ORDER: This Court has instituted a reduced payment procedure for indigent plaintiffs who are institutionalized but who are not prisoners as defined in 28 USC Section 1915(h). A reduced payment is assessed of 50% of such plaintiff's average monthly income for the six months preceding the filing of the complaint (not to exceed the $400 filing fee).Income includes all deposits from any source. The plaintiff Philip Wolff is currently detained at Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility, and is thus subject to the reduced payment procedure. However, the plaintiff's ledgers for the past six months show an average monthly income of $1.00 or less. No reduced filing fee will be assessed. Entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 5/29/19. (FDS, ilcd)
|
| Filing 6 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. by Philip Wolff (FDS, ilcd) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Philip Wolff. Responses due by 6/11/2019 (FDS, ilcd) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Antwone Steward. Responses due by 6/11/2019 (FDS, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiffs Antwone Steward and Philip Wolff. Responses due by 6/11/2019 (FDS, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division, 100 NE Monroe Street,Peoria,IL 61602.Merit Review Deadline set for 6/3/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(FDS, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Antwone Steward and Philip Wolff.(FDS, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 5/13/19. Plaintiffs Antwone Steward and Philip Wolf have not filed petitions to proceed in forma pauperis nor paid the $400 filing fees. The Clerk is directed to mail to the plaintiffs applications to proceed in forma pauperis. Within 30 days (Misc DDL 6/12/19), plaintiffs must either pay the $400 filing fees or file applications to proceed in forma pauperis, along with account statements for the previous six months, or the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. (FDS, ilcd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
