Gales v. Saul
Elizabeth Duke Gales |
Comm'r Social S Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul |
CSS-Social Security Administration |
4:2019cv04184 |
September 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Sara Darrow |
Jonathan E Hawley |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. § 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by Elizabeth Duke Gales as to US ATTORNEY GENERAL 10/29/2019. (RL, ilcd) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Andrew Saul served on 10/2/2019, answer due 1/30/2020. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(RL, ilcd) |
|
Filing 4 PETITION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Elizabeth Duke Gales. Responses due by 10/10/2019 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 USM 285- OGC, #3 USM 285- Atty Gen, #4 USM 285- US Atty)(Osterhout, Karl) |
|
Filing 2 STRICKEN PETITION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Elizabeth Duke Gales. Responses due by 10/9/2019 (Attachments: #1 IFP Proposed Order, #2 USM 285- OGC, #3 USM 285- Atty Gen, #4 USM 285- US Atty)(Osterhout, Karl) Modified on 9/25/2019 to reflect stricken per Text Order of 9.25.19 (WG, ilcd). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Elizabeth Duke Gales. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Osterhout, Karl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.