Harold v. Brannon et al
| Tony Harold |
| Terry Stone, Jane and John Does, Robert Hamilton, Christine Brannon, Pat Ruhl and Kenny Grant |
| 4:2019cv04199 |
| October 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| James E Shadid |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 12/6/2019. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1) The Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. Section 1915A. 2) If Plaintiff believes he can articulate an Eighth Amendment claim based on deliberate indifference to a serious medical condition, he may file an amended complaint in compliance with this order within 21 days. If Plaintiff fails to file his amended complaint on or before December 27, 2019, or fails to follow the Court's directions, his case may be dismissed. 3) If Plaintiff would prefer to pursue his Illinois negligence claims in state court, he may file a motion to voluntarily dismiss within 21 days or on or before December 27, 2019. The Court will then dismiss this action and refund any unpaid portion of the filing fee. 4) Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is dismissed with leave to renew #5 . 5) The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide Plaintiff with a blank complaint form and reset the internal merit review deadline within 30 days of this order. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG, ilcd)
|
| Prisoner Initial Partial Filing Fee received 11/21/2019, in the amount of $ 8.00; receipt number 14626035739. (RK, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Chief Judge James Shadid. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division, 100 NE Monroe Street, Peoria, IL 61602. Merit Review Deadline set for 10/29/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $19.61. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court. After payment of the initial partial filing fee (or immediately if no funds are available for that payment) the agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff's account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff's place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 10/9/2019. (SAG, ilcd)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Tony Harold. Responses due by 10/22/2019 (SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. by Tony Harold (SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Tony Harold.(SAG, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Tony Harold. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SAG, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
