McCray v. Scott et al
| Leonardo McCray |
| D McNeely, J McCurry, K Rose and Gregg Scott |
| 4:2020cv04035 |
| February 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sue E Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Leonardo McCray. D McNeely waiver sent on 4/2/2020, answer due 6/1/2020; K Rose waiver sent on 4/2/2020, answer due 6/1/2020. (KE, ilcd) |
| Filing 9 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to K. Rose and D. McNeely on 4/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 Waiver Rose)(KE, ilcd) |
Filing 8
HIPAA QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 4/2/2020. See written order. (KE, ilcd)
|
|
Filing 7
MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 4/2/2020. Plaintiff's petition to proceed in forma pauperis is granted #3 . Pursuant to a review of the Complaint, the Court finds that Plaintiff states a federal constitutional claim against Defendants McNeely and Rose for excessive force. This case proceeds solely on the claims identified in this paragraph. Any additional claims shall not be included in the case, except at the Court's discretion on motion by a party for good cause shown or pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. Defendants Scott and McCurry are dismissed without prejudice and terminated. Plaintiff's motion for counsel is denied with leave to renew #5 . The Clerk is directed to enter the standard qualified protective order pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The Clerk is directed to attempt service on Defendants pursuant to the standard procedures. See written order. (KE, ilcd)
|
| Filing 6 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Leonardo McCray. (KE, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 2/20/2020. This Court has instituted a reduced payment procedure for indigent plaintiffs who are institutionalized but who are not prisoners as defined in 28 USC Section 1915(h). A reduced payment is assessed of 50% of such plaintiff's average monthly income for the six months preceding the filing of the complaint (not to exceed the $400 filing fee).Income includes all deposits from any source. The plaintiff Leonardo McCray is currently detained at Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility, and is thus subject to the reduced payment procedure. However, the plaintiff's ledgers for the past six months show an average monthly income of $1.00 or less. No reduced filing fee will be assessed. (KE, ilcd)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Leonardo McCray. Responses due by 3/4/2020 (KE, ilcd) |
| Filing 4 Letter from Clerk of the Court requesting Trust Fund Ledgers. (KE, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Leonardo McCray. Responses due by 3/4/2020 (KE, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Sue E Myerscough. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Springfield Division, 600 E Monroe, Springfield,IL 62701.Merit Review Deadline set for 3/10/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(KE, ilcd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Leonardo McCray. (Attachments: #1 Scanning Page)(KE, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
