Prince v. Trinity Hospital et al
| Kendrick Prince |
| Trinity Hospital and . Fierce |
| 4:2020cv04180 |
| August 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| James E Shadid |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 10/13/2020. Plaintiff's motion for a status update is granted #5 . The Clerk is to provide Plaintiff with a copy of the docket sheet. Plaintiff will receive a copy of the merit review order considering the claims in Plaintiffs' complaint and his motion for appointment of counsel when it is entered. (SAG, ilcd)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Kendrick Prince. Responses due by 10/22/2020 (FDS, ilcd) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Status by Plaintiff Kendrick Prince. Responses due by 10/22/2020 (FDS, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $50.49. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court within 30 days of this order. After payment of the initial partial filing fee (or immediately if no funds are available for that payment) the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source, including gifts. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff`s account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. Plaintiff is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the initial partial filing fee and required monthly payments are made. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this case. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff's place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office, and to Plaintiff. Entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 9/3/2020. (SAG, ilcd)
|
| Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. by Kendrick Prince (FDS, ilcd) |
| Filing 3 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Kendrick Prince.(FDS, ilcd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge James Shadid. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division, 100 NE Monroe Street, Peoria, IL 61602. Merit Review Deadline set for 9/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG, ilcd) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 8/24/2020. Plaintiff has filed a Complaint but has not paid the $400 filing fee nor filed a petition to proceed in forma pauperis. Within 21 days of the entry of this order, Plaintiff must pay the $400 filing fee in full or file a petition to proceed in forma pauperis with attached trust fund ledgers for the last 6 months. Failure to comply without good cause will result in dismissal of this case without prejudice, and the Plaintiff will still be responsible for payment of the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1914. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff the forms for proceeding in forma pauperis.(SAG, ilcd)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kendrick Prince.(SAG, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
