Tuduj v. Menard Pharmacist et al
Tom Tuduj |
. Siddiqqui, Boswell Pharmacy Services LLC, T Bradley, Todd Brooks, Quantum Vision Centers, John Baldwin, Patty Sneed, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Frank Lawrence, Rob Jeffreys, Kimberly Butler, Donald R Unwin and Menard Pharmacist |
4:2020cv04245 |
November 25, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Harold A Baker |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Remark: This case has been opened in the SDIL as case 3:20-cv-01273. (TK, ilcd) |
Filing 3 ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 11/25/2020. It is therefore ordered:2. Clerk is directed to open a new case against the Menard Defendants that includes the following documents: Plaintiff's Complaint #1 ; a copy of this Order; and, Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint 13 . Clerk is directed to transfer the new case to the Southern District of Illinois for any actions the transferee court deems necessary. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER.(SAG, ilcd) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Tom Tuduj. Responses due by 12/9/2020 (SAG, ilcd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Tom Tuduj. (Attachments: #1 part 2)(SAG, ilcd) |
Case transferred to the Southern District of Illinois. Case was electronically submitted to the transferee court. (SAG, ilcd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.