Latko v. Oesar et al
| Edward Latko |
| Beth Oesar, Pamela Bredt, Hughes Lochard, Wexford Health Sources Inc and Culberton Memorial Hospital |
| 4:2022cv04033 |
| February 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Karen L McNaught |
| Sue E Myerscough |
| Tom Schanzle-Haskins |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT entered. (KE) |
Filing 10
MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 4/19/2022. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's IFP petition #3 and motions for counsel #4 , #8 , #9 . For the reasons stated in the Court's Merit review Order, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's case with prejudice. The Court advises Plaintiff that the dismissal of this action will count as one of his three allotted "strikes" under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Sec 1915(g). If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this judgment, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. See written order. (KE)
|
|
TEXT ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on April 14, 2022. Due to Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins's retirement, this case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Karen L. McNaught for further proceedings. (KB)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Edward Latko. Responses due by 3/29/2022 (KE) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Edward Latko. Responses due by 3/23/2022 (KE) |
| Filing 7 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Edward Latko. (KE) |
| Filing 6 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Edward Latko. (KE) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Sue E. Myerscough on 2/25/2022. This Court has instituted a reduced filing fee procedure for indigent plaintiffs who are institutionalized but who are not prisoners as defined in 28 USC Section 1915(h). A reduced payment will be assessed of 50% of such plaintiff's average monthly income for the six months preceding the filing of the complaint (not to exceed the $402 filing fee). Income includes all deposits from any source. Plaintiff Edward Latko is currently detained at Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility, and is thus subject to the reduced payment procedure. Plaintiff's ledgers for the past six months show an average monthly income of $319.54. Plaintiff is ordered to send an institutional check or money order in the amount of $159.77, payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court within 30 days from the date of this order. The reduced fee may be waived if the plaintiff, within 14 days of this order, files a motion to waive the fee and demonstrates good cause for such waiver.(KE)
|
| Filing 5 Letter Requesting Trust Fund Ledger. Trust Fund Ledgers due by 3/10/2022. (KE) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Edward Latko. Responses due by 3/10/2022 (KE) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Edward Latko. Responses due by 3/10/2022 (KE) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Sue E Myerscough. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Urbana Division, 201 S Vine Street, Urbana, IL 61802.Merit Review Deadline set for 3/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(KE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Edward Latko. (Attachments: #1 Scanning Page)(KE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
