Crayton v. East Moline Police Department
| Keimon Crayton |
| East Moline Police Department |
| 4:2022cv04067 |
| April 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Colin Stirling Bruce |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE: The Clerk of the Court has been notified of Plaintiff's change of address in case number 23-4005. As a courtesy to Plaintiff, and in order to maintain accurate information in the Court Electronic Filing system, Plaintiff's address has been updated in this closed case. No further action is required. (KE) |
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 7/12/2022. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration #26 is DENIED. Plaintiff has offered no new fact or any new legal argument with which to convince the Court that it should reconsider its Merit Review Order. Likewise, Plaintiff's motion for leave to add Defendant #27 is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion contains no factual allegations that would show that the Defendant-to-be added violated Plaintiff's Constitutional rights. (KE)
|
| Filing 27 MOTION for Leave to Add/Remove Defendants by Plaintiff Keimon Crayton. Responses due by 7/25/2022 (SAG) |
| Filing 26 MOTION for Reconsideration re #24 Order by Plaintiff Keimon Crayton. Responses due by 7/21/2022 (SAG) |
| Filing 25 JUDGMENT entered. (KE) |
|
Filing 24
ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 6/21/2022. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended compliant #23 is DENIED because Plaintiff's proposed amended complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 28 U.S.C. Sec 1915A; Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). This case is closed and is dismissed without prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to enter a judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. The Clerk of the Court is directed to add this case to the three-strikes list against Plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within thirty (30) days of the entry of judgment. See written order. (KE)
|
| Filing 23 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Keimon Crayton. Responses due by 6/24/2022 (SAG) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 6/7/2022. Plaintiff's motion for status #22 is GRANTED, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of the docket sheet in this case to Plaintiff. (KE)
|
| Filing 22 MOTION for Status by Plaintiff Keimon Crayton. Responses due by 6/21/2022 (SAG) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE by Keimon Crayton (SAG) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE by Keimon Crayton (SAG) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE by Keimon Crayton (SAG) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of claims by Keimon Crayton (SAG) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of claims by Keimon Crayton (SAG) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 5/24/2022. Plaintiff's motion for release #16 is DENIED. Plaintiff asks the Court to order his release from custody because he fears retaliation for filing several federal cases. "To obtain a preliminary injunction, the moving party must show that its case has some likelihood of success on the merits' and that it has 'no adequate remedy at law and will suffer irreparable harm if a preliminary injunction is denied.'" Stuller, Inc. v. Steak N Shake Enter., Inc., 695 F.3d 676, 678 (7th Cir. 2012)(quoting Ezell v. City of Chicago, 651 F.3d 684, 694 (7th Cir. 2011). Plaintiff has offered no evidence to support his request for release from custody. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion is denied. (KE)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION by Plaintiff Keimon Crayton. Responses due by 6/6/2022 (SAG) |
| Filing 15 Mail Returned as Undeliverable, re 5/3/2022 Text Order. Mail sent to Keimon Crayton (KE) |
|
Filing 14
MERIT REVIEW ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 5/10/20 22. Plaintiff's motion for copies #8 is GRANTED, and the Clerk of theCourt is directed to send a copy of Plaintiff's Complaint to him. In the future, Plaintiff will need to pay ten cents per page for copies of any documents, motions, or pleadings that have been filed with the Court. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 28 U.S.C. Sec 1915A; Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff is given leave to file a proposed amended complaint that complies with the dictates of this Order. Plaintiff should file his proposed amended complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to do so, the Court will dismiss this case. See written order. (KE)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Change of Address and NOTICE of Claims by Keimon Crayton. New address is Chester Mental Health Center. (SAG) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Change of Address by Keimon Crayton. No new address given. (SAG) |
| Filing 11 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER by Keimon Crayton. (KE) |
|
TEXT ORDER granting #4 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 5/3/2022. Plaintiff's trust fund ledgers indicate he has no funds to make an initial partial payment of the filing fee. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b) (4), the initial partial filing fee is waived. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court. Income includes all deposits from any source. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff's account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff's place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office. (KE)
|
| Filing 10 Letter from Plaintiff Keimon Crayton (SAG) |
| Filing 9 Exhibit re #1 Complaint by Keimon Crayton. (KE) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for copies by Plaintiff Keimon Crayton. Responses due by 5/13/2022 (SAG) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE filed by Plaintiff Keimon Crayton (SAG) |
| Filing 6 Letter from Plaintiff Keimon Crayton regarding trust fund ledger (SAG) |
| Filing 5 Letter Requesting Trust Fund Ledger. Trust Fund Ledgers due by 5/5/2022. (KE) |
| Filing 4 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Keimon Crayton.(KE) |
| Filing 3 Letter from Plaintiff Keimon Crayton (SAG) |
|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Colin Stirling Bruce on 4/12/2022. Plaintiff has filed a Complaint but has not paid the $402 filing fee nor filed a petition to proceed in forma pauperis. Within 21 days of the entry of this order, Plaintiff must pay the $402 filing fee in full or file a petition to proceed in forma pauperis with attached trust fund ledgers for the last 6 months. Failure to comply without good cause will result in dismissal of this case without prejudice, and the Plaintiff will still be responsible for payment of the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1914. The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff the forms for proceeding in forma pauperis. (KE)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Colin Stirling Bruce. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Urbana Division, 201 S Vine Street, Urbana, IL 61802.Merit Review Deadline set for 5/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(KE) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Keimon Crayton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KE) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Crayton v. East Moline Police Department | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Keimon Crayton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: East Moline Police Department | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
