Sykes v. Warden, AUSP Thomson
Terrance Sykes |
Warden, FCI Thomson and Warden, AUSP Thomson |
4:2022cv04076 |
April 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Sara Darrow |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 7 MOTION to Recall and Withdraw Transfer Order and to Reopen Proceeding on Motion to Waive the Filing Fee by Petitioner Terrance Sykes. Responses due by 11/16/2022 (RES) |
![]() |
Filing 6 MOTION to Correct Filing Pursuant to Rule 60(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by Petitioner Terrance Sykes. Responses due by 8/5/2022 (JRK) |
![]() |
Filing 5 Letter from Terrance Sykes (RES) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Correct Clerical Error by Petitioner Terrance Sykes. Responses due by 5/23/2022 (RES) |
Remark: Case transferred from Illinois Central has been opened in Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.4 as case 1:22-cv-02210, filed 04/28/2022. (JRK) |
![]() |
Case transferred to the Northern District of Illinois. Case was electronically submitted to the transferee court. (RES) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Terrance Sykes. Responses due by 5/10/2022 (Attachments: #1 envelope)(RES) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Terrance Sykes. (Attachments: #1 petition part 2, #2 envelope)(RES) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.