Ashford v. Donathan
| Anthony Ashford |
| Gregg Donathan |
| 4:2022cv04153 |
| October 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Michael M Mihm |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Letter to Plaintiff from Clerk of Court in response to request for copies #8 (SAG) |
| Filing 8 Request for copies by Anthony Ashford (SAG) |
Filing 7
ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 10/20/2022. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:1. Plaintiff's Motion to Request Counsel #5 is DENIED. Plaintiff does not indicate if he attempted to obtain counsel on his own. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If Plaintiff renews his motion for appointment of counsel, he is to provide copies of the letters he has sent to, and received from, prospective counsel. 2. Plaintiff's #6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER. (SAG)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Anthony Ashford. Responses due by 11/2/2022 (SAG) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Request Counsel by Plaintiff Anthony Ashford. Responses due by 11/2/2022 (SAG) |
| Filing 4 +++ PRISONER TRUST FUND LEDGER. by Anthony Ashford (SAG) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Anthony Ashford. Responses due by 11/2/2022 (SAG) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Michael Mihm. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division, 100 NE Monroe Street, Peoria, IL 61602. Merit Review Deadline set for 11/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gregg Donathan, filed by Anthony Ashford.(SAG) |
|
TEXT ORDER: This Court has instituted a reduced payment procedure for indigent plaintiffs who are institutionalized but who are not prisoners as defined in 28 USC Section 1915(h). A reduced payment is assessed of 50% of such plaintiff's average monthly income for the six months preceding the filing of the complaint (not to exceed the $402 filing fee). Income includes all deposits from any source. The plaintiff Anthony Ashford is currently detained at Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility, and is thus subject to the reduced payment procedure. However, the plaintiff's ledgers for the past six months show an average monthly income of $1.00 or less. No reduced filing fee will be assessed. Entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 10/19/2022. (SAG)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ashford v. Donathan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anthony Ashford | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gregg Donathan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
