Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
Michael Smith |
Commissioner of Social Security |
CSS-Social Security Administration |
4:2022cv04184 |
December 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Sara Darrow |
Jonathan E Hawley |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Jonathan E. Hawley on 12/20/2022 GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915. The Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis was submitted under penalty of perjury and sufficiently demonstrates that the Plaintiff should be excused from paying the filing fee in this action. (WG) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Jean M Godfrey on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Godfrey, Jean) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Joseph Stephen Sellers on behalf of Michael Smith (Sellers, Joseph) |
Filing 2 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Michael Smith.(Sellers, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Michael Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 USM-285 form, #6 USM-285 form, #7 USM-285 form)(Sellers, Joseph) |
NOTICE of Social Security Complaint filed. Commissioner of Social Security answer due on 2/13/2023. (RES) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.