Washington v. Karlin et al
| Marion Devonne Washington, Sr |
| Jeremy Karlin, Bryan Anderson, Nathan Lewis, Patrick Kisler, Blake Carr, Russell L Idle, N. Harlan, Daniel J Hostens, Jared Tapscott and K Small |
| 4:2023cv04110 |
| June 30, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Sara Darrow |
| Jonathan E Hawley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT ORDER entered by Chief Judge Sara Darrow on August 2, 2023. Plaintiff's #2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs is DENIED because he did not submit form AO 239, which is the proper form to request permission to proceed without prepaying the filing fee. He may pay the filing fee or file form AO 239 by September 5, 2023. If he fails to do so, his #1 complaint may be dismissed. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of form AO 239 to Plaintiff. (MLM)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Other Deadline set for 9/5/2023. See Text Order entered on 8/2/2023. (RES) |
| Filing 3 Letter from Plaintiff Marion Washington regarding phone number. (BMG) |
| Filing 2 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by Marion Devonne Washington, Sr.(ED) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Marion Devonne Washington, Sr. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(ED) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
