Bell v. Glazier
Plaintiff: Timothy Bell
Defendant: Steve Glazier
Case Number: 4:2026cv04138
Filed: May 27, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Michael M Mihm
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2026 Remark: Case transferred from Illinois Central has been opened in Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF NextGen 1.9 (rev. 1.9) as case 1:26-cv-06255, filed 05/28/2026. (JJK)
May 27, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 3 TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 5/27/2026. Plaintiff filed a Complaint #1 under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 alleging violations of his constitutional rights. Venue for federal civil rights actions is governed by 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1391(b). According to that statute, such actions may be brought only in (1) the judicial district where any defendant resides (if all defendants reside in the same State), (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought. Plaintiff files suit against Defendant Steve Glazier, the Assistant Director for the Department of Human Services Conditional Release Program. In his Complaint, Plaintiff states the Northern District of Illinois is the appropriate venue for this action because it is where the events giving rise to this action occurred and where Defendant Glazier works. (Doc. #1 at p. 2). Plaintiff states Defendant Glazier is located in Oakbrook, Illinois. Id. at p. 3. Oakbrook is located in DuPage County, Illinois, which is situated in the federal judicial district of the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 93(a)(1). It appears that a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims in this lawsuit occurred in the Northern District of Illinois, and Defendant Glazier is located in Northern District of Illinois. The Court therefore finds that venue over this proceeding is in the Northern District and that it is in the interest of justice for this cause to be transferred there. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1404(a). No summons shall issue in this action unless directed by the transferee court. The Clerk is directed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. (VH)
May 27, 2026 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Timothy Bell. Responses due by 6/10/2026 (VH)
May 27, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Steve Glazier, filed by Timothy Bell.(VH)
May 27, 2026 Case electronically transferred to District of Northern District of Illinois. (VH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bell v. Glazier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Glazier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?